Jump to content

 

 

Rangers go to battle with football authorities


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bill said:

Surprised to see that Vincent Lunny is still involved on the SFA licensing committee.

Maintaining influence.

Maintaining jobs for life for the bhoys.

 

 

Edited by Uilleam
Link to post
Share on other sites

All this stuff re  place-men is part of the reason I still have a beef with Murray. When he handed over the reins he left a power vacuum which that lot eagerly filled. They may have been conspiring in the background with strategic position filling, but when Martin Bain ceased to be in the corridors of power they pounced and immediately trained their sights on Campbell Ogilvie.

 

It'll take some time to re-dress the balance and I look forward to the day when we are back on top in more ways than one, it can't come quickly enough.

Edited by Soulsonic5791
Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Soulsonic5791 said:

All this stuff re  place-men is part of the reason I still have a beef with Murray. When he handed over the reins he left a power vacuum which that lot eagerly filled. They may have been conspiring in the background with strategic position filling, but when Martin Bain ceased to be in the corridors of power they pounced and immediately turned their sights on Campbell Ogilvie.

 

It'll take some time to re-dress the balance and I look forward to the day when we are back on top in more ways than one, it can't come quickly enough.

It looks like there is a clear-out so as nobody is answerable. Burning bridges back to Peter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeezo these 'journalists' sure know how to mangle the facts.


 

Quote

 

He had conducted an eight-month investigation into the episode before he issued the charges. The principal hearing into the case will be on June 26, with Rangers having said the club will “fiercely resist” what it called “ridiculous” charges.

 

 

 

It is true that he had conducted an 8 month investigation before issuing these charges but that was on another matter that they found was entirely baseless. They then decided to try another approach with these two charges. It might not seem like a huge alteration but it is an alteration of the facts as they stand and also colours the readers perspective into the new charges veracity. It must be true they investigated it for 8 months before they charged them!

Edited by Big Jaws
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.