Jump to content

 

 

The Summer 2018 Transfer Window Rumours and Deals


Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, craig said:

If going 4-3-3 and one of the midfield 3 is a "10" then you effectively have 8 players for 3 positions, 10 when Dorrans and Rossiter are fit - that is too many IMO.  Options are great, but we need (could still happen admittedly) more striking options.

 

The 3 up front right now would, effectively, be Morelos (or Sadiq), Candeias and Murphy - the only back up would be Middleton (untested at that level) and maybe Ejaria - because Windass is ineffective when playing wide.

 

I think we look much, much stronger in midfield now - but we need forward and creative options.  It does appear that Gerrard/Allen have gone down the route of trying to make us a team whereby the mantra of "if you don't lose goals you don't lose games" and that actually makes sense, particularly when we were the leagues top scorers last season.... if you can continue that whilst being tighter defensively then you have to think you give yourself a good chance.

 

But I just cant help but think that we need more forward options - we badly need a natural scorer - someone like a McCoist or, dare I say it, a Boyd - someone who instinctively knows where the net is and finds it - Morelos, despite his goals, is not that guy.

I'm still not sure it's too many. You can't just have 2 players for each position, each carbon copies of each other in terms of role. We have options now.

 

Halliday will be on his way, and Dorrans and Rositter will be bit-part players. 

 

We can agree do disagree there. 

 

I agree, we most definitely need more options up front; we're very short.

 

Is Rudden ready? He looked OK on Thursday, a penalty-box striker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I don't think it's worrying. I think the player profile is encouraging

I agree with this, I’m glad we’re signing a French/African 22 year old and it’s encouraging that we apparently have a clause to sign him permanently in the contract. It’s a  risky strategy when they don’t have the pedigree though especially when Aberdeen’s success has largely been built on an ultra low risk strategy involving signing and loaning players who have a track record of performing in our league. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DMAA said:

I agree with this, I’m glad we’re signing a French/African 22 year old and it’s encouraging that we apparently have a clause to sign him permanently in the contract. It’s a  risky strategy when they don’t have the pedigree though especially when Aberdeen’s success has largely been built on an ultra low risk strategy involving signing and loaning players who have a track record of performing in our league. 

What I like about our strategy is the "option to buy" - it allows us to walk away if they don't work out.  It is a very smart strategy which should be used more often by more clubs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Rousseau said:

I'm still not sure it's too many. You can't just have 2 players for each position, each carbon copies of each other in terms of role. We have options now.

 

Halliday will be on his way, and Dorrans and Rositter will be bit-part players. 

 

We can agree do disagree there. 

 

I agree, we most definitely need more options up front; we're very short.

 

Is Rudden ready? He looked OK on Thursday, a penalty-box striker.

10 players for 3 positions is still too many, regardless of variations - we cant say that Rossiter will be "bit-part" - he is out for 2-4 weeks with a rolled ankle, despite his injury record that hardly consigns him to the scrapheap.

 

To be clear though - I am happy if we have that many midfielders.... but only if we strengthen the frontline - there is little point having tons of midfielders and only two recognized strikers in Morelos and Sadiq.  Would have preferred that one more of those midfielders was creative as we see to have a lot of midfielders, but few with the creative spark needed (though I guess we do have Candeias, Murphy, Ejaria and probably even Arfield & Windass who can create).

 

If we bring in even just one more striker (a natural goalscorer please), and assuming we go 4-3-3 where the front 3 is a striker and 2 wingers - then we should be set I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We won't have too many mifldfielders, not nearly. At least four will be hospitalised for large parts of the season and most of those not injured will be suspended.  We'll  be playing people out of position to cover by November and have to bring in emergency replacements in January. 

 

If we are anywhere even near the chance of a title at the split, we will get another horrendous run of fixtures and all midfielders will get suspensions.

 

We  will have none left to play for us in May and be complaining about lack of midfield cover. 

 

CheeryLoyal aka Realisticloyal. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

We still don't have a creative midfielder.

Harry Wilson is the only name mentioned who’d add that dimension. A journalist called Phil Hay claimed that if he was going anywhere it would be to us. As well as seeing if he’s ready for their bench maybe they’re keen to see if we pass our first few Europa league hurdles first too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.