Jump to content

 

 

Just what we require (new fans group formed)


Recommended Posts

Fair enough mate. The hardline stance that they tend to adopt isn't everyone's cup of tea but they do have moments when their comments are valid in a wider context.

 

P.S. In response to Buster, was typing up as Bill had already posted.

Edited by Soulsonic5791
Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bill said:

It’s disappointing to see a group of Rangers fans who have been so active in addressing the club’s detractors being sniped at by Gersnet members. VB has nothing to be ashamed of and much to be proud of. Those taking cheap shots and making false assertions should be ashamed of themselves. If you feel so strongly why not take your views directly to VB.

Bill, I take it you have some connection to VB?

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bill said:

It’s disappointing to see a group of Rangers fans who have been so active in addressing the club’s detractors being sniped at by Gersnet members. VB has nothing to be ashamed of and much to be proud of. Those taking cheap shots and making false assertions should be ashamed of themselves. If you feel so strongly why not take your views directly to VB.

That's certainly a typical VB line (at least from some that I encountered on forums) and actually says more about them than I did.

 

xD

Link to post
Share on other sites

VB make some good comments and statements but always resort to an anti-FF/King stance and occasionally make rather badly worded and childish statements.

 

They reflect an ongoing problem within the Rangers support (and aren't the only ones) - we are fractured and house several 'fringe' groups.  It'd be nice if we could find some common ground, other than wanting to see a successful Rangers...but I won't hold my breath.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Soulsonic5791 said:

Fair enough mate. The hardline stance that they tend to adopt isn't everyone's cup of tea but they do have moments when their comments are valid in a wider context.

 

P.S. In response to Buster, was typing up as Bill had already posted.

Moments, yes !

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

VB make some good comments and statements but always resort to an anti-FF/King stance and occasionally make rather badly worded and childish statements.

 

They reflect an ongoing problem within the Rangers support (and aren't the only ones) - we are fractured and house several 'fringe' groups.  It'd be nice if we could find some common ground, other than wanting to see a successful Rangers...but I won't hold my breath.

 

 

Where do you get your info from? VB was supportive of the King consortium taking over. 

Edited by Bill
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Soulsonic5791 said:

I'm genuinely surprised Bill. 

 

Did you think I was slagging them off with what I said in the last few posts?

No, why would you think that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.