Jump to content

 

 

Just what we require (new fans group formed)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Soulsonic5791 said:

Bluedell - Brian Stockbridge and David Griffiths are involved in this.

 

People like the aforementioned are playing on your emotional ties to enable them to put their hands in your pocket.

 

Does that not merit calling it for what it is?

 

 

Why do you think that Stockbridge is involved?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bluedell said:

Why do you think that Stockbridge is involved?

There have been suggestions in the past he's friends with Griffiths.  IIRC the latter was a guest of his in the Directors' Box in times gone by.

 

Perhaps a leap to say he'd then be involved with this fans group but it was interesting that mad Phil had the scoop on this group the other day (probably fed by Irvine).

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frankie said:

FWIW, I'd prefer the language was more temperate as well.  I get your cynicism but let's keep the criticism constructive.  :)

Fair enough Frankie - apologies. 

 

Maybe I should abstain from these threads but surely people recognise Stockbridge and the like for what they are, no?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frankie said:

There have been suggestions in the past he's friends with Griffiths.  IIRC the latter was a guest of his in the Directors' Box in times gone by.

 

Perhaps a leap to say he'd then be involved with this fans group but it was interesting that mad Phil had the scoop on this group the other day (probably fed by Irvine).

I've gone to Rangers games with plenty of dodgy characters over years. It doesn't mean anything.

 

As for the concern about mad Phil getting information on it, if the VBs are happy to give this organisation their backing and someone like John McKee is involved then I don't have any worries about their "staunchness".

 

That's not to say that it's going to be a roaring success but I don't see any reasons at this point to doubt the sincerity of its aims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Soulsonic5791 said:

Fair enough Frankie - apologies. 

 

Maybe I should abstain from these threads but surely people recognise Stockbridge and the like for what they are, no?

No need to apologise. I think we need knowledgeable people commenting but we need to keep criticism fair and accurate. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask/say one last thing then I'll shut up.

 

Why are people in such a rush to hand over their money to people who claim to be acting in their interests as Rangers supporters?

 

The opacity levels of these things are a turn off right from the get go.

 

But hey, different strokes for different folks as they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Bluedell said:

Why not just tell me? Is it a secret?

Without getting in to the realms of hearsay, I've been told that there is involvement.

 

The people that want rid of King and his chums smell an opportunity. As is always the case, useful pawns are collated and deployed in order to promote legitimacy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.