Bluedell 6,045 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 On 27/04/2018 at 15:48, colinstein said: just to clear it up...I did find it on another forum.....the info was extracted and pasted on it....and I couldn't find it on the links you put up.... Expand It's the very bottom link on that page. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 On 27/04/2018 at 16:26, Bluedell said: It's the very bottom link on that page. Expand yes...thank you Bluedell........I couldn't be arsed going through it all....without direction .I knew it would be easier to get on a tims site 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,893 Posted April 27, 2018 Author Share Posted April 27, 2018 #Rangers chairman Dave King has been told he has breached takeover rules by failing to make an £11 million bid for 70 per cent of the club's shares he was forced by a court to make by Thursday because he has not yet got confirmed funds in the UK. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 4,129 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Methinks I read something that the funds need to be released in the RSA and will be around in early May. Obviously, the "Panel" has to apply the 28 day rule etc.pp. ... probably a technicality. All nice and tidy ahead of an Old Firm game. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 On 27/04/2018 at 17:13, der Berliner said: Methinks I read something that the funds need to be released in the RSA and will be around in early May. Obviously, the "Panel" has to apply the 28 day rule etc.pp. ... probably a technicality. All nice and tidy ahead of an Old Firm game. Expand Not according to the bheasts. The court set a date and King has refused to comply. According to them that's the reason King wasn't at the semi-final. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Also according to them there are 2 "unstarred" actions relating to all of this in the courts at the moment. Unstarred means King didn't need to appear in person. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 4,129 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 I take it they are as much clued up about their Co-Op Bank loan facility due in the not too long distant future ... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,833 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 I would have thought King would either know the rules or have advisors who know the rules 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 4,129 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 On 27/04/2018 at 17:52, compo said: I would have thought King would either know the rules or have advisors who know the rules Expand Well, King seemingly does quite a few things his own way, not least when it comes to court rulings and somesuch. In this case, it might simply be a hold up with the money needed though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,649 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 On 27/04/2018 at 17:18, boabie said: Also according to them there are 2 "unstarred" actions relating to all of this in the courts at the moment. Unstarred means King didn't need to appear in person. Expand Unstarred means nobody has to appear. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.