boabie 230 Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 (edited) No. It's all true. In fact the discussions between the members of our board have been quoted verbatim on at least 3 mank websites, all of whom claim to be friends with the mole at our club. Oh, and 2 of our directors had a meal with Regan at a city centre hotel restaurant when how many points deduction would aply following our pre pack admin were discussed. Another mole heard it all. I believe it and am currently getting dressed to head out to the bookies. Edited January 9, 2018 by boabie 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 1,909 Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 The trouble with setting up so many begging (crowd sourced) blogs is that those gullible enough to support them demand insight, whether true or otherwise. Hence why Phil 3 names invents multiple personas, fake sources such as Rugger Chap and all of that baloney. In reality, for the most part, they know as much as Sergeant Schultz. But that doesn't satisfy the hooped masses, so now we're onto Admin 9543 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooponthewing 1,139 Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 4 hours ago, Frankie said: You can select your own avatar in your profile options (top right of screen). Thanks for the Info? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,453 Posted January 9, 2018 Share Posted January 9, 2018 It seems like the anti-Rangers brigade in the media takes the opportunity of the break in play to publish all sorts of rubbish on a nigh daily basis now. In the very least, the club should take note of it and simply ban these publications from any access to Rangers. Full stop. I do wonder whether amongst the e.g. members / shareholders in Club1872 there is no decent and/or willing lawyer to challenge the media with such bile, as it clearly damages the club's reputation and thus goes straight against the shareholders' interests. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffer 1,665 Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Or we could profit out of it. Isn't it prudent for this company to hedge at least part of it's bet? If that's the case, and if these are real bets and the company closed betting because it stood to lose too much, can't we offer to hedge it? If these gullible folk are so sure it's going to happen, why not get oddschecker to offer at 10:1 and then we will hedge at 11:1 on. 10% (or thereabouts) is a decent return. That would be a story!!! Celtic fans betting we will be relegated and us betting that they're a bunch a lying losers. It'll be an even bigger story when we're collecting the winnings and laughing in their faces. That would be funny as well as profitable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.