Frankie 8,674 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 (edited) Red card from Killie game rescinded. http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish_fa_news.cfm?page=2565&newsCategoryID=3&newsID=17361 Disciplinary Tribunal Update Ryan Jack, Rangers FC Thursday, 2 November 2017 Player Reference: Ryan Jack, Player, Rangers FC Match: Rangers FC v Kilmarnock FC, Wednesday, 25 October 2017 Competition: SPFL: Premiership Offence: A2 Violent Conduct Fast Track Tribunal Hearing: Thursday, 2 November 2017 Outcome: Dismissal for A2 Violent Conduct rescinded, caution for the B1L offence of Unsporting Behaviour imposed in its place. Fee returned. Hopefully the lad will learn his lesson from this and stay away from cheating morons like Kirk Broadfoot. Edited November 2, 2017 by Frankie 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Red card from Killie game rescinded. http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish_fa_news.cfm?page=2565&newsCategoryID=3&newsID=17361 Hopefully the lad will learn his lesson from this and stay away from cheating morons like Kirk Broadfoot. Why is Broadfoot. not called up for stamping on toes feigning injury? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,674 Posted November 2, 2017 Author Share Posted November 2, 2017 Why is Broadfoot. not called up for stamping on toes feigning injury? I assume because the referee booked him at the time. Once again the system shown to be flawed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 6,005 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 One player, two red cards, both rescinded. What does that say about the competence of the referees, or their motive? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 I assume because the referee booked him at the time. Once again the system shown to be flawed. Yes on one side they say the Ref can get it wrong and on the other they say he seen it and dealt with it, he can't be wrong. I suppose they don't want every yellow card questioned so they put that rule in place. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,429 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Surely in incidents like this, if the red card is overturned the referee (or in this case more likely the 4th official) has to be suspended for his utter incompetence. We had a situation where the 4th official has got involved from 50 yards away to "correct" the referee who had issued a yellow card, and it turns out the 4th official was wrong. I dont know whot he 4th official was that night, but there simply has to be an internal investigation as to why he thought he should get involved in that incident when the 4th official only usually gets involved if managers step out of line, or the incident is right in front of them. Personally, I cannot believe Jack "got away with it" as IMO he eventually got what he deserved for his intention to hit Broadfoot (both with knee and hands/head) instead of moving away and let us hit the penalty. I dont see how the CO can overturn that decision. Given that this decision has now been made however, we should be raising this second rescinded red card in 10 games with the authorities, along with the numerous non-red cards that should have been shown against our opponents, and demanding an explanation as to why we are on the receiving end of all the wrong decisions in our matches this season? And make it public knowledge. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waltersgotstyle 307 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 So two cards rescinded in games where we have dropped points... If he stayed on the park we may only have been 1 point off top. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Surely in incidents like this, if the red card is overturned the referee (or in this case more likely the 4th official) has to be suspended for his utter incompetence. We had a situation where the 4th official has got involved from 50 yards away to "correct" the referee who had issued a yellow card, and it turns out the 4th official was wrong. I dont know whot he 4th official was that night, but there simply has to be an internal investigation as to why he thought he should get involved in that incident when the 4th official only usually gets involved if managers step out of line, or the incident is right in front of them. Personally, I cannot believe Jack "got away with it" as IMO he eventually got what he deserved for his intention to hit Broadfoot (both with knee and hands/head) instead of moving away and let us hit the penalty. I dont see how the CO can overturn that decision. Given that this decision has now been made however, we should be raising this second rescinded red card in 10 games with the authorities, along with the numerous non-red cards that should have been shown against our opponents, and demanding an explanation as to why we are on the receiving end of all the wrong decisions in our matches this season? And make it public knowledge. Video referee is the answer so the referee is certain to be right. Then you can drop the compliance officer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,429 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Video referee is the answer so the referee is certain to be right. Then you can drop the compliance officer. If Craig Thomson (other examples are readily available!) is the Video referee we will still be victimised. The VR is still, for a lot of decisions, making a judgement call. Was a particular tackle reckless and deserving of a red card? The answer, even after umpteen viewings is still that it is not a red card for Scott Brown but it is for Ryan Jack. Scott Brown's weekly off the ball elbow will still be ignored. Louis Moult still gets away with breaking Cardoso's nose. However there is more chance of getting obvious errors right at a time when it can still influence the game if a VR is in play, which I support. Offside goals etc are a matter of fact.not judgement. I would take that small comfort at least, as well as Tony getting his well-earned P45. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,402 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 The red card did not cause result V Killie.,it was the most dreadful penalty I've ever seen by a Rangers and the subsequent failure in defence. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.