buster. 5,264 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Story going round is that everything was agreed with McInnes. Rangers drew up the contract and it stated that Mark Allen had the final say in any transfers. That was not what had been agreed with McInnes so he walked away. Were you playing Chinese whispers around a table ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Were you playing Chinese whispers around a table ? I am not in the know. just putting up what is being rumoured around the boards. Probably crap. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,772 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Given the fact Aberdeen refused us permission to speak to McInnes I don't see how we could have had any discussions with him about transfers or anything else 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 You're just embarrassing yourself at this stage.Good answer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,299 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Story going round is that everything was agreed with McInnes. Rangers drew up the contract and it stated that Mark Allen had the final say in any transfers. That was not what had been agreed with McInnes so he walked away. A daft rumour which Tims made up. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,270 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 Given the fact Aberdeen refused us permission to speak to McInnes I don't see how we could have had any discussions with him about transfers or anything else probably bercause hes been speaking to our board for the last 4 weeks 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 919 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 You asked for a golden nugget! Chesney not on your radar then? Id actually have him ahead of some of the names on the list. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,299 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 We can't have an ex-Tim player, manager or a Tim fan managing Rangers. No chance. I can't believe any Rangers supporter would stand for it. Proud'homme or Tommy Wright for this Bear. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,820 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 (edited) Given the fact Aberdeen refused us permission to speak to McInnes I don't see how we could have had any discussions with him about transfers or anything else You know, I read about what an embarrassment the Board or the club is since we were declined to speak to McInnes and his decline to join us. And how long it takes to find a new Rangers manager and whatnot. Well I grant that the Scottish guys are probably "well conditioned" by the amount of negativity that comes their way on a daily basis for about 6 years or so, but I am still more disappointed in the amount of acceptance of hearsay and conjecture being welcomed instead of either reason or indeed information given by the club. While I know some will aim their barrels at me saying "you cannot and shall not trust everything that comes from the club as truth", I would reply in kind that there is no need to do the contrary either. For that is what appears to be the case more often than not. Just take the stuff above. People said all was done and dusted weeks ago, despite we have not been allowed to talk to McInnes. Whispers in the background and all. Now, had we talked to McInnes, do we all think that there would not have been any of the same whispers telling the media about this and Aberdeen - you know, these hate-filled idiots from the East who really like us, from top to bottom - would not have come out all guns blazing and sued us for tapping McInnes up? Or are we to expect that this side of the hush-hush stuff would be immune to leaks? In any case, given the fact that we have very little information either way, perhaps we should let reason prevail? What we know is that we officially did not speak to McInnes. What we see is a certain amount of speculation that does essentially just one thing: discredit the Board. I would suggest that we stay vigilant as ever, but untowards everyone. Edited December 9, 2017 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 919 Posted December 9, 2017 Share Posted December 9, 2017 We can't have an ex-Tim player, manager or a Tim fan managing Rangers. No chance. I can't believe any Rangers supporter would stand for it. . Why not? If he does the best for Rangers I dont have any issue. I would stand for it! Your Neanderthal mentality is all thats wrong. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.