StuGers 477 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/NaeBull/status/910583167073095680 Absolutely horrendous dive from Sinclair. Penalty from Beaton (no surprise). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walterbear 557 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 He has certainly exaggerated any contact with the knee and made a neal of it. There was no contact with the left foot. I honestly can't tell if there was contact with the knee from that angle. Sutton desperately looking for the foul when it's not clear at all. Also noticed the BT 'pundits' thought a Dundee player should have got a straight red for a studs up challenge in the first half. Different tune when it's Rangers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Looks like Sinclair actually clipped his own heel..... Minimal challenge from the Dundee player. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 15,294 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 They'll probably haul the Dundee player up before the beaks for having the audacity to tackle a yahoo. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walterbear 557 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Looking at it again on larger screen I would say that the Dundee player is standing his ground and not moving his knee to Sinclair. Sinclair knee catches the defender and then he makes an absolute meal of it. Easy to see why Beaton got conned. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,939 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Beaton was either desirous of awarding a spot kick, or terrified not to do so. I don't believe that he was actually deceived. Sinclair clearly dived, and, thus, and this is important, gained an advantage for his side. In such a circumstance the Compliance Officer must undertake a review. I should not advise a wager of any sort, of even the meanest value. on that happening, far less on any sanction emerging from the Mount Florida Knights' Club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/NaeBull/status/910583167073095680 Absolutely horrendous dive from Sinclair. Penalty from Beaton (no surprise). The Tims, pretty much en masse, have said this was a stonewaller 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuGers 477 Posted September 21, 2017 Author Share Posted September 21, 2017 Whilst there may have been minimal contact, was it really enough to result in the theatrics seen? You have to remember Aluko was hauled up by Compliant Tony for doing exactly that - he deemed that although there was contact, his reaction didn't match the cause. But let's be honest, this is just one in a long line of questionable decisions either for Celtic / against us this season and we're not even that far in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 let's not get Paranoid this was a penalty that could be given. If some of you are not sure if there was contact after umpteen replays then I would say given the ref saw it once in real time then it is not a decision we should be particularly bothered about. Some will be given and some not. For Celtic they will be given and for the rest, not. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 let's not get Paranoid this was a penalty that could be given. If some of you are not sure if there was contact after umpteen replays then I would say given the ref saw it once in real time then it is not a decision we should be particularly bothered about. Some will be given and some not. For Celtic they will be given and for the rest, not. Although there is merit in what you say, Stugers' point in #8 is also valid. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.