union 0 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 jackson pushing liewell’s agenda further. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/peter-lawwells-mission-expose-scottish-11146603 Peter Lawwell’s mission is to expose Scottish football’s bad apples then go ahead but if it’s about the Ibrox trophy cabinet we’re in for a rough ride – Keith Jackson Rangers By Keith Jackson Keith Jackson says if the Celtic chief’s aim is to expose wrongdoing then he could be trying to do the Scottish game a monumental turn. …read more Read the full article here: dailyrecord.co.uk 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 jackson pushing liewell’s agenda further. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/peter-lawwells-mission-expose-scottish-11146603 Peter Lawwell’s mission is to expose Scottish football’s bad apples then go ahead but if it’s about the Ibrox trophy cabinet we’re in for a rough ride – Keith Jackson Rangers By Keith Jackson Keith Jackson says if the Celtic chief’s aim is to expose wrongdoing then he could be trying to do the Scottish game a monumental turn. …read more Read the full article here: dailyrecord.co.uk No thanks I will leave it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
union 0 Posted September 11, 2017 Author Share Posted September 11, 2017 No thanks I will leave it. Same attitude our board seems to have. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,210 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 Good to see Jacko back in the pocket of the man who controls everything in Scottish football. If that wasn't the case Keef would be keen to highlight the double standards at play when it comes to tax avoidance. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,548 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 https://twitter.com/RangersObserver/with_replies 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,405 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 (edited) If Peter Lawwell's mission is to expose Scottish football's bad apples then go ahead but if it's about the Ibrox trophy cabinet we're in for a rough ride - Keith Jackson Celtic chief executive would be doing Scottish football a monumental turn by exposing any wrongdoing. There may well be a thousand unanswered questions regarding the events which led to the liquidation of Rangers. But now that Scottish football is back on the brink of all out thermonuclear warfare, two in particular stand out from all the rest. They may even be inextricably linked. What exactly is Celtic chief executive Peter Lawwell hoping to achieve by pointing his missiles at Hampden’s sixth floor? And what are the SFA so doggedly determined to keep hidden in their bunker? If the answer to the first question is - as some of Celtic’s hard core dearly wish it to be - the stripping of titles from the Ibrox trophy cabinet then Lawwell is playing with fire. If that is his end game and if he is successful then one day he will be deemed worthy of his very own statue on the Celtic Way. But at what price to the rest of the Scottish game? Because, in doing so, he will open up wounds which will never heal over and also force his club’s relationship with Rangers into a whole new world of bitterness and hostility. Yes, the next door neighbours deserved to be punished for the financial meltdown which was a result of their own reckless hubris and which cast a huge shadow over the entire Scottish game. But the Ibrox club will argue, with some justification, that they have already paid an enormous price for the crimes which were carried out in their name. Craig Whyte, administration, Duff and Phelps, liquidation, Charles Green, League Two, Bilel Mohsni. There is a strong argument here that Rangers and their supporters have had to suffer indignity like few others in the history of the sport since Sir David Murray took them to the brink. Throughout all of it, Celtic’s superiority has soared to uncharted levels. Six successive top flight titles have already been banked along with millions upon millions of Champions League pounds. Today Lawwell presides over a club which has never been so powerful or so much more mighty than the rest. Assuming he wishes to stay for the long haul then it is entirely possible that he will be in charge when his club is celebrating ten-in-a-row and cementing the second greatest era of its history behind the legend which was written in Lisbon. Tomorrow he’ll be rubbing shoulders in the Parkhead boardroom with Paris St Germain counterpart Nasser Al-Khelaifi, who just might be the single most powerful mover and shaker anywhere in world football right now - while watching his side complete against Neymar, the most expensive player of all time. And yet, in the middle of this period of unsurpassed empire building, are we really to believe that Lawwell is still spitefully lusting for the blood and the titles of his long since vanquished rivals? I’m sorry but that just doesn’t seem logical especially given the circumstances of the Rangers demise. The misuse of EBTs is what brought this club to its knees. A tax avoidance scheme which was ultimately exposed as a vulgar scam. For the normal working man on the street, of course, such blatant attempts at stiffening the tax man and robbing the public purse are morally reprehensible. But this is how big business works. And football is big business. Yes, without question some of the big names lured to Scotland by Rangers during that period were attracted by the financial inducements that the club was ultimately unable to afford. So, yes, it follows that Rangers almost certainly did gain a sporting advantage by the use of these EBTs. But they’ve more than paid the price for this recklessness. To strip them of titles won on the pitch because of the financial jiggery pokery which was going on off it, wouldn’t just seem needlessly heavy handed. It would also be hypocritical given the lengths so many others in Scottish football go to in the name of running rings around Hector. And spare me too this notion that it’s all somehow in the interests of learning lessons for the future. How many more lessons need to be learned over and above the obvious? It’s simple really. Don’t spend what you don’t have and make damn sure HMRC gets what it's due. No, there has to be another, greater aim for Lawwell and it can’t just be a public pandering to the element of his own support who are hellbent on squeezing Rangers until their pips squeak either. Which brings us back to the second question. If the SFA really has nothing to hide then why are they behaving in such a curious, highly suspicious manner? Could it be that, rather than looking to bloody an already badly broken blue nose, Lawwell has reason to believe that certain individuals are being protected by this stonewalling of his demands for a full review into this never ending shambles. Because, if that is his real motivation, then Lawwell could be attempting to do the entire game in this country a monumental turn. If there are people still clinging on to lofty positions of power despite being reputationally tarnished by their parts in this entire fiasco, then it serves the interests of the game for their wrongdoing to be exposed. For example, I’ve been writing for long enough now that Stewart Regan is unfit for purpose as the SFA’s chief executive, and if an investigation into Rangers can offer up conclusive proof of his incompetence then all well and good. While it would be a surprise if Regan was Lawwell’s target given the previously close relationship between the pair, it would be a welcome plot twist nonetheless. But there could be others whose actions need to be explored including those of Rangers head of administration Andrew Dickson whose involvement in the notorious side letters hasn’t prevented him from climbing the SFA’s own ladder. Better still, if it is Celtic’s belief that there has been some sort of institutionalised cover up, all propped up and endorsed by the SFA, then Lawwell is justified in demanding both accountability and action. Perhaps that way, something good and important might come out of the Rangers farrago. Let us hope that this is the sort of positive closure which Celtic are seeking. The alternative, a closure which does nothing more than open up old wounds, can only end badly. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/peter-lawwells-mission-expose-scottish-11146603 Didn't know Rangers were liquidated. (Can we ban Jackson?) Craig Whyte, administration, Duff and Phelps, liquidation, Charles Green, League Two, Bilel Mohsni. Ahem, what? For the normal working man on the street, of course, such blatant attempts at stiffening the tax man and robbing the public purse are morally reprehensible. Yep, it took the Supreme Court to determine that our EBTs were taxable. We would have paid the tax at the time, if that was necessary. Or used other ways of paying the players, as our Chairman has pointed out. And make no mistake, what we did with the EBTs on a large scale, would be done by you and your next door neighbour too, albeit on a lesser scale. Everyone wants to reduce his/her taxes. If you read KJ's words, you could think we stole money ... Yes, without question some of the big names lured to Scotland by Rangers during that period were attracted by the financial inducements that the club was ultimately unable to afford. So, yes, it follows that Rangers almost certainly did gain a sporting advantage by the use of these EBTs. There goes the party line! Oh wait, we did not win all trophies during that era, far from it. Where is the advantage? But they’ve more than paid the price for this recklessness. To strip them of titles won on the pitch because of the financial jiggery pokery which was going on off it, wouldn’t just seem needlessly heavy handed. It would also be hypocritical given the lengths so many others in Scottish football go to in the name of running rings around Hector. Oh dear, some half-hearted sense. Better still, if it is Celtic’s belief that there has been some sort of institutionalised cover up, all propped up and endorsed by the SFA, then Lawwell is justified in demanding both accountability and action. Perhaps that way, something good and important might come out of the Rangers farrago. Let us hope that this is the sort of positive closure which Celtic are seeking. So Regan blocks the path of the puppet-player, the latter cuts the ties and hangs his new, more compliant doll on the strings. A doll that looks at Rangers and Rangers only. Oh wait, KJ totally forgot to say that any cover up might involve anyone else but Rangers ... Edited September 11, 2017 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted September 11, 2017 Share Posted September 11, 2017 A Judas is a Judas no matter who they sell their soul too, Keech is just one of a long line who sold their integrity to the tims for patronage. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,548 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 Same attitude our board seems to have. I have to agree, it's ok to say ignore them but if you don't keep an eye on your enemies they will be on top of you before you know it, usually when it's too late! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26th of foot 5,928 Posted September 12, 2017 Share Posted September 12, 2017 OK, here's the precis : I, Keith Klaxon do solemnly swear to maintain my standard of life. For as long as my paper remains the subservient partner in a commercial relationship with ra Sellik, I will write what my BIG BOSS, Peter tells me to write. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.