union 0 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 craig whyte cleared of all charges. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barebear 37 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 craig whyte cleared of all charges. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-40156934 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,405 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 Disgusting, the law is an ass. I thought I was being paranoid to have no faith in a Glasgow Jury and a Scottish Prosecutor to bring home a just verdict, but turns out I was right all along. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 Unfecking believable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walterbear 557 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 Unfecking believable. Staggering. I could almost get s not proven fraud verdict but how he got off with the companies act charge is mind boggling. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pj_1872 0 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 I just can't get my head around how buying a company with the company's own assets is legal but clearly there's some loophole there. However, as we all already knew - the main villain here is Murray. He and his team had to know what was going on. Time to move on. Good times ahead. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,720 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 (edited) Is there an option to appeal and take it out of a jury's hands?, is it worth it? Edited June 6, 2017 by ian1964 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,357 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 Too much media coverage before and during the trial IMO is to blame.The case should never have been trid before a jury as there are too many prejudices against Rangers,it should have been decide by senior judges/counsell. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 Can someone please explain how he could agree a deal with ticketus for season ticket money before he actually owned the club.....and how could CW provide proof of funding without receiving the Ticketus money previous to the sale going through??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuGers 477 Posted June 6, 2017 Share Posted June 6, 2017 I actually cannot believe that is the verdict. Is there some sort of loophole in the law that was used in the defence? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.