der Berliner 3,820 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) Perhaps O'Halloran for Garner sooner rather than later, to hit them with pace on the right. MOH can also track back. Sidenote, had the headbut been comitted by one of our players, he'd be off ... no doubt whatsoever. Edited April 9, 2017 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,761 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Big Dunc was jailed for a weaker headbutt......... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Solid performance thus far, with each and everyone doing their duty. Impressed by Beerman and Bates, who seem to have risen to the challenge ... though either is well protected by the good working team ahead of them. Holt is doing most of the defensive stuff, giving Hyndman and Toral (who has been targeted numerous times) some freedom to work the ball about. You start cursing our luck in front of goal ... Don't think it is luck, would be some run of bad luck were that the case! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Garner is either a player who enjoys the physical aspect or he isn't. He can't have it both ways. There was not enough contact for him to fall to the ground. He went down therefore he cheated and I hate to see that from any Rangers player. I never had much time for Lafferty but when he did it I lost what little respect I ever had for him. Whether it is is red card or not doesn't come into it. Are we now saying we'll get a fair shake from any referee nowadays ? Garner embarrassed himself and the club. Even if we ran out 7-0 winners todays everything would focus on Garners behaviour. Get him punted asap. He's nowhere near good enough anyhow. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,966 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Lafferty feigned contact. Garner was butted twice. Neither blow should have decked him, I agree, but it was "violent conduct". If Garner had been the aggressor, he would have walked, of that I have no doubt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) Not sure about that sub/ I would have pulled Garner and put Hyndman further up in the Garner role. Edited April 9, 2017 by aweebluesoandso 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 919 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Why take Hyndman off, thats is utterly bizarre 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 This is a very worrying spell. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooponthewing 1,139 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Chaos since Hyndman subbed? Midfield gone to shit! Why why why sub Hyndman?? No rational explanation, there just isn't one? He wasn't injured and looked lost for words! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 Why take Hyndman off, thats is utterly bizarre He looked upset at the decision, too. Which you want in a player in general though it's not so good to put a loanee off you, especially given the media stories around his future. Not that these would be reasons on which a manger would base his choice, tbf. I wish he was still on the pitch, though, whatever way you look at it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.