Why do our own constantly get it wrong to our cost ?

[boabie 230]

I see Barry Ferguson has been mouthing off to the Daily Record yet again -

 

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/dave-king-needs-come-out-9327689?

 

This bit, not for the first time when Rangers men are discussing the club, stood out to me, " King made a lot of big promises before he was given the keys to the castle. He talked about spending anywhere between £30m and £40m on the team and even quadrupling the wage bill in order to take the fight to Celtic on the pitch."

 

No Barry. That's not what he said. Here is King speaking at the time, " ‘My view of what it will take to make Rangers competitive again is bottom end £30m but probably £50m — over the next four years,’ King told Sportsmail.

‘From the discussions I have to date I think there are other people who would come with me.

‘But I would say I would probably have to put in £30m of the £50m over the period of time. And I could probably get other people to put in £20m.

‘Would I be willing to invest £30m despite what happened previously? Of course. Sure.’

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2588429/Dave-King-commit-30m-ensure-Rangers-return-Scottish-Premiership.html

 

 

 

Or indeed from a previous Daily Record article , “I have gone on record that we will need £30million to rebuild the team AND THE CLUB, but it depends where we are next season. "

 

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/dave-king-cost-rangers-30million-5736071

 

C'mon guys, there are enough of the obsessed and deluded earning a living from spreading falsehoods about Rangers. Get it right please.

[Uilleam 5,681]

i think that your answer is "leading questions".

[jhunter 0]

cash first

 

Rangers a distant second