Rangers fans' group in crisis as three chiefs quit in row over management

[plgsarmy 111]

From bluegates on RM

 

Just to keep the board updated, it was Christine Sommerville who confirmed the person was known and that it was not in anyones interest to let it get out.

I have sent her 3 emails back since she confirmed the person was known, i've also called her and left voicemails twice - I now wonder if the number I was given was false.

 

So is he now being accused of lying .

 

It was never said to him that the person was known and no calls were made to the (correct) phone number and no Voicemails left.

Edited July 9, 2016 by plgsarmy

[rbr 1,270]

It was never said to him that the person was known and no calls were made to the (correct) phone number and no Voicemails left.

 

so just to be clear your calling him a liar regards to the phone calls and voice mails but are admitting the emails

Edited July 9, 2016 by rbr

[Frankie 8,665]

Frankie best asking bluegates exactly what happened , its so absurd its nearly laughable ,it all revolves around some innocent email s that were sent ignored deleted , twitter accounts getting blocked then apologies emails sent and twitter account unblocked , but someone is lying and trying to cover the whole thing up .

 

When it comes to a few RM users and our fan groups, I'm not always convinced anything is innocent. However, clearly, if a someone is interested in the new fan group, their questions should be answered openly and without prejudice.

 

FWIW, social media can be tricky to navigate at the best of times and it's easy to have misunderstandings on there. I myself had an issue with someone a few weeks back when I misread their sarcasm. An apology is the best solution when such happens. We all make mistakes.

[rbr 1,270]

Frankie that's all the guy asked for

 

 

[rbr 1,270]

But the whole thing has now grown arms and legs , why I can't fathom out

 

 

[plgsarmy 111]

so just to be clear your calling him a liar regards to the phone calls and voice mails but are admitting the emails

 

He was e-mailed, yes, but at no time was he told that the person was known. His screenshots were taken at face value but further information received leads us the believe they were not authentic.

[rbr 1,270]

He was e-mailed, yes, but at no time was he told that the person was known. His screenshots were taken at face value but further information received leads us the believe they were not authentic.

That makes absolutely no sense at all , in fact it stinks

 

 

[the gunslinger 3,366]

That makes absolutely no sense at all , in fact it stinks

Would it be a surprise though.

 

As Frankie says how innocent were they.

Edited July 9, 2016 by the gunslinger

[plgsarmy 111]

That makes absolutely no sense at all , in fact it stinks

 

In what way?

[rbr 1,270]

In what way?

Why would he make up a story about a perfectly innocent email then his twitter account was blocked then unblocked plus the replies from club1872 or are they all fake as well