JFK-1 1,693 Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 If Mark Warburton were ever to be unhappy about anything at Rangers you can be 110% guaranteed that you're not going to be finding out about it via some arsehole with a blog. I took a look at some of the opposition forums after the semi final and aside from their standard "sevco" obsession they also have an obsession with Warburton and entertain fantasies that he is going to walk away at any moment. He isn't and they are going to continue indulging in all manner of fantasies about a club that doesn't even exist in their prime fantasy. That alone is a perfect illustration of how unhinged minds have become in their camp which I find totally baffling. Has 4 years with no competition made them happy? Considering their Euro humiliations you would imagine they should be welcoming real competition rather than the odds on cakewalk they have been ambling along with. Surely there must be at least some over there who experience some discomfort over these bizarre obsessions. It would even appear to an outsider looking in that they have forgotten they supposedly have a club of their own at all. On any topic the Record as an example publishes with a Rangers connection the comments section is rapidly swamped not by Rangers fans but by them. While stories on their own club get one or two or even no comments at all. Bizarre isn't sufficient to describe it. There are no words. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 He might have phoned him. But it seems unlikely. He's ion holiday. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 McGobbledigook doesn't say a word about what was in the conversation TB. He says he got a call from MW who is a "nice guy".He then goes off at a tangent talking about his own perceived view of MW after the final and his own false detail of MW's wage, bonus and transfer budget. He then talks about some other manager on holiday. What he is actually trying to say isn't at all clear. The point I am making is, if MW called the bigot he should be spoken to about it. If he didn't then someone from the club should be calling the b*st*rd out as a liar. doubt very much ill Phil has MW mobile number! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,948 Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I intend to file the singular revelations of Mcgillivan, together with the Resolution 12 phantasmagoria, under "Fireless Smoke". 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 Phil seems to think he got hold of Warbs number and called him. He claims warbs called him back. There is a teeny chance that happened since Warbs didn't know who he was calling but I seriously doubt it. The rest of the blog just goes on a tangent because there is really nothing else to say - except of course that Phil told him all about his journalistic credentials. Whatever the case, Rangers should NOT be responding to Phil because that legitimises him and as far as I'm aware writing fan fiction on the internet is not a crime. If anyone believes that even if Warbs DID call Phil that he gave him anything other than a polite go away, you really aren't giving Warburton his due. Everyone could see how angry he was at the Semi Final scenes. It was clear as day, but he was right to stay away from the press because they would hound him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,199 Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 What PMGB and other bloggers in the same 'stable of spin' currently seek to do is to unsettle and undermine our club, making at as difficult as possible for those in charge. Best reaction is to IGNORE. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted June 10, 2016 Author Share Posted June 10, 2016 Whatever the case, Rangers should NOT be responding to Phil because that legitimises him and as far as I'm aware writing fan fiction on the internet is not a crime. As said earlier - there is no need for Rangers to name him. All they have to say is, " There have been allegations that our manager telephoned a serial fantasist . A man who is making a living from spreading lies about our club. We would make it clear that yet again this so called journalist is talking shyte." 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 (edited) This is the guy who writes the celtic blog for the DR, but he has written probably the best description I've seen of this & how Phil works: Jamie @JamesVonDoom 19h19 hours agoPhil's stories always follow a familiar narrative. Jamie @JamesVonDoom 19h19 hours agoHere's how it works. You take something which can't be proven, which is false. You write a wee story about it but ALWAYS include a caveat. Jamie @JamesVonDoom 19h19 hours agoX event was/is going to happen unless Y occurs. Warbs WAS going to leave but isn't. Rangers WILL go bust, unless they pay Y bill. Jamie @JamesVonDoom 19h19 hours agoAnd it's quite genius because, try and disprove that Warburton story? You can't. Because when Warbs turns up to work next week. It stands. Jamie @JamesVonDoom 19h19 hours agoHe's made a name, a career and probably money out of this for about 5 years. Comics. That's what he writes, comics. Edited June 10, 2016 by Rousseau Fixed last tweet 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 As said earlier - there is no need for Rangers to name him. All they have to say is, " There have been allegations that our manager telephoned a serial fantasist . A man who is making a living from spreading lies about our club. We would make it clear that yet again this so called journalist is talking shyte." But why would you? You can't put a serious statement out about a serial fantasist. And 'allegations'? I think sometimes we feel online that people like Phil make a bigger impact than they actually do. Very few people swallow his guff. I just wouldn't entertain it. Unless I'm told otherwise by Rangers or Warbs just doesn't turn up again, I don't believe a word of it, and neither should anyone else. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 I think he's one for the club to ignore so as not to give him the exposure he craves. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.