Bluedell 5,423 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 do Murray and King now not have a 2-1 majority on the board. Maybe a deal is being brokered. We do have a majority at present but it may not mean anything if SD have the right to appoint someone else, which, if the do, they could do at a drop of a hat. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Plus they have all the voting rights. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 If you listen to yon fanny John James, Ashley has resigned and appointed the two most experienced guys in the whole wide world ever because their expertise is in fighting the sort of battles Rangers will soon be facing. Oh, and Asley is producing pure mullions of strips which cannot be sold but which Rangers are going to have to pay for. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Is it not just a case of him not wanting to be involved in a company who is eventually going to go bust? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,974 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 Seeing as he publicly admits he has lost control of SDI, he also infers that he hasn't the time for anything else. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,423 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 I can't see him walking away from the Rangers Retail deal without a fight. It's personal between him and King. It could be a tactical withdrawal. It could make it harder to have board meetings, for example, which may make a subsequent SD legal claim easier. I'd expect there to be a bigger picture that none of us can see. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 I can't see him walking away from the Rangers Retail deal without a fight. It's personal between him and King. It could be a tactical withdrawal. It could make it harder to have board meetings, for example, which may make a subsequent SD legal claim easier. I'd expect there to be a bigger picture that none of us can see. don't think it's personal at all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,423 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 don't think it's personal at all. It wasn't when it started, but it is now. These guys work on ego, and don't want to see themselves bettered. If it was purely based on business then Ashley would have sat down and renegotiated a deal that would result in more money for both parties. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted June 8, 2016 Share Posted June 8, 2016 It wasn't when it started, but it is now. These guys work on ego, and don't want to see themselves bettered. If it was purely based on business then Ashley would have sat down and renegotiated a deal that would result in more money for both parties. his problem isn't with King it's with anyone who gets in his way 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted June 8, 2016 Author Share Posted June 8, 2016 The Fat man's tanks have lost their fear factor, in fact the more tanks he brings to the fray the more enjoyment seeing them blown to smithereens. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.