Craigie 0 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Hi everyone. Putting the end of the game unacceptable behaviour aside yesterday. I would like to look at our team and the way we played. 3 soft goals conceded, which has been consistent all season. Where are the defence? I am enjoying being linked with different players, however none seem to be defensive other than Barton and he is a big if to come now IMO. We desperately need a commanding centre half like the way Davie Weir or Amasouso were. We also need a strong defensive midfield player, I am not sure if Crooks fits that bill or not. Someone who is smart and will not be bullied! Any thought? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,598 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Tav and Kiernan had poor games and Wallace looked out of sorts after a quarter of an hour we could see we were struggling 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,974 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 MW in his interview leading up to the games was what I thought and mentioned in the SCFinal thread, more candid than usual in his observation that we'd only find out on the day if our preperation had been adequate. I get the feeling that MW was half expecting that an undercooked Rangers would produce a less than brilliant performance. Not that the mgmt team didn't put in place what they thought was the best possible plan, more what he saw in front of him during the lead-up to yesterday connected to the lack of 100% fit options didn't install confidence. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,564 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 We have been rather poor ever since clinching the title and beating the Scum. We had a tendency of shipping silly goals (and some of them (but sure not all) were wonder-strikes that the scorers probably haven't scored ever since or before) all season, at times (!) you did wonder whether McCulloch and Mohsni were actually worse. Point is, we had little cover and flexibility. Kiernan, Wilson and Ball weren't consistently good either, mind you, Ball is 20 and had next to no competitive footie before us. We can count ourselves lucky that the whole defensive line stayed injury free, or we would have had a serious problem. Yet, I doubt that MW and SDoW will want a repeat of that next season. Crooks will be a help, but we sure need more and will get them. Keeping Ball would be a decent start, but some more exerience is required too. A Barton in midfield wouldn't go amiss either. Right now, we have to wait and see. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigie 0 Posted May 22, 2016 Author Share Posted May 22, 2016 Only 5 subs too and one was 17, great to have promising youngsters, but we need strong experienced players too. With leadership on the park. Wallace can't do it alone. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,564 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Only 5 subs too and one was 17, great to have promising youngsters, but we need strong experienced players too. With leadership on the park. Wallace can't do it alone. TBH, Wallace's leadership on the park (for quite some time, actually) is taking up responsibility and going forward and scoring the odd goal. I can't really remember him yelling at our players and setting them straight if performances aren't up to scratch. Maybe it isn't his style. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,974 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 TBH, Wallace's leadership on the park (for quite some time, actually) is taking up responsibility and going forward and scoring the odd goal. I can't really remember him yelling at our players and setting them straight if performances aren't up to scratch. Maybe it isn't his style. Wallace has been an excellent captain this season and sets an example in the way he plays and how he conducts himself. I'd note that there was talk of him pulling out of the Scotland squad prior to yesterdays game and wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't 100% fit in the Final. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 Only 5 subs too and one was 17, great to have promising youngsters, but we need strong experienced players too. With leadership on the park. Wallace can't do it alone. As said eleswhere here, our squad is extremely thin and had replacements been available I've no doubt MW would have made changes at half time. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggordy 0 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 MW in his interview leading up to the games was what I thought and mentioned in the SCFinal thread, more candid than usual in his observation that we'd only find out on the day if our preperation had been adequate. I get the feeling that MW was half expecting that an undercooked Rangers would produce a less than brilliant performance. Not that the mgmt team didn't put in place what they thought was the best possible plan, more what he saw in front of him during the lead-up to yesterday connected to the lack of 100% fit options didn't install confidence. After calmly reflecting on the game, we probably played better than we should have. The lack of game play over the past few weeks definitely paid a huge part in our defeat, especially as Hibs had played several "cup finals" in the same period. Like Warbs said, we'll only know which would be the best preparation for yesterday. after the game itself. Right from the start we had several unforced errors and bad passes...and god only knows what we were thinking at their first goal! They went on to have many more chances than us and it was credit to all that their win wasn't more convincing. In this case, match fitness definitely won over technical fitness. I believe we lost just due to "circumstances" having finished our games earlier than them. However, if the game had gone to extra time, the result might have been different. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,974 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 After calmly reflecting on the game, we probably played better than we should have.The lack of game play over the past few weeks definitely paid a huge part in our defeat, especially as Hibs had played several "cup finals" in the same period. Like Warbs said, we'll only know which would be the best preparation for yesterday. after the game itself. Right from the start we had several unforced errors and bad passes...and god only knows what we were thinking at their first goal! They went on to have many more chances than us and it was credit to all that their win wasn't more convincing. In this case, match fitness definitely won over technical fitness. I believe we lost just due to "circumstances" having finished our games earlier than them. However, if the game had gone to extra time, the result might have been different. We did well to hang-on in the first-half and then Haliday scored a cracker to put us ahead. Somehow we'd put ourselves into a winning position and both teams started to look like knackered boxers struggling to land a punch. A well taken corner exposed a sleeping defence and Hibs were buoyed and always the team most likely to win it in 90 minutes. When they got that corner in injury time, all it needed was a good delivery for it to be the equivalent to a penalty. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.