Frankie 8,562 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 It would be a fairly reasonable conclusion to come to, rightly or wrongly. Wrongly as it seems to be. I'd rather wait for the facts than resort with the kind of ill-informed and very personal nonsense we read in some places. Maybe that's just me... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 I don't think so. I may have you as a guest at a Gersnet dinner but it doesn't mean I'm paying for it. you were at the 'gersnet dinner ?....which one were you ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
limeburner 0 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Wrongly as it seems to be. I'd rather wait for the facts than resort with the kind of ill-informed and very personal nonsense we read in some places. Maybe that's just me... I agree,iwas commenting strictly on the wording,it was poor. Dont know Mr graham and have never made a comment about him.ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,562 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 you were at the 'gersnet dinner ?....which one were you ? The handsome fella gorging himself on poppadums... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 naw....that wiz me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 I am getting a bit confused. The reason for having a powerful fan group was to have a more transparent and better relationship with the club. As soon as the club has contact with the supporters groups many are shouting about the independence of the group. Surely you can't have a working relationship if it doesn't go both ways. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 call my cynical but those who are shouting about independence of fan groups are the same ones who are against fan ownership, King and the present board and who supported the revolving door on the board as we got skinned by those passing through. Not that they support Ashley of course ! (that's the new narrative) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,256 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 call my cynical but those who are shouting about independence of fan groups are the same ones who are against fan ownership, King and the present board and who supported the revolving door on the board as we got skinned by those passing through. Not that they support Ashley of course ! (that's the new narrative) Totally disagree , I'm fully for fan ownership , am fully behind what RF stood for , but an totally confused as to the direction that Club1872 are heading Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 Totally disagree , I'm fully for fan ownership , am fully behind what RF stood for , but an totally confused as to the direction that Club1872 are heading apologies to those who are not in that category Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted April 29, 2016 Share Posted April 29, 2016 (edited) Agreed - and a sensible one at that. I get people want Club1872 to be independent and we do have to be careful to avoid conflicts of interest. But, in this case, people over-reacted to some (albeit bad) wording about a figure they clearly dislike. That's really sad but also unsurprising. Im sorry Frankie but I dont think that is correct. You have guys like Bearger and RBR on here as well as others who have no ill feeling towards Chris Graham expressing concern over the wording. Had it been Greg Marshall instead of Chris Graham who was advertised as a "guest of the club" then Im certain the same concerns would have been aired. Thats not to say some who harbour ill feeling did not try make the most of this error - but there was bona fide concern expressed by bears who harbour no malice or ill will. Edited April 29, 2016 by D'Artagnan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts