Rangers will receive funds needed to challenge Celtic, says vice-chairman Paul Murray

[calscot 0]

Ironically, in this boom time for other Scottish clubs with Rangers in the lower divisions, our second placed team in the top league, Aberdeen, have a coeff of 4.580. The best club outside Celtic are Motherwell at 8.08. Celtic are on 39.08 at 55th place.

 

We're 113th and ranked above all teams currently already qualified including West Ham.

 

I think it's safe to say we'll be seeded.

[calscot 0]

Hearts and Aberdeen will be in the first round...

[calscot 0]

Or maybe a miracle and that's where Celtic will be...

[buster. 4,974]

Ironically, in this boom time for other Scottish clubs with Rangers in the lower divisions, our second placed team in the top league, Aberdeen, have a coeff of 4.580. The best club outside Celtic are Motherwell at 8.08. Celtic are on 39.08 at 55th place.

 

We're 113th and ranked above all teams currently already qualified including West Ham.

 

I think it's safe to say we'll be seeded.

 

Cal, you are looking at the wrong year.

 

These are the numbers they would use if we qualify.

http://kassiesa.home.xs4all.nl/bert/uefa/data/method4/trank2016.html

 

ie. the last five seasons up to and including 2015/16.

We are in 267th place.

 

-----------------------------------

 

The access list is determined by numbers collated by the five seasons up to and including 2014/15.

http://kassiesa.home.xs4all.nl/bert/uefa/access2016.html

Edited April 19, 2016 by buster.

[calscot 0]

I think we are touch and go for seed for round 4 but leaning slightly on being seeded. That's massive as it could mean avoiding the teams from the big 5.

[calscot 0]

Cal, you are looking at the wrong year.

 

These are the numbers they would use if we qualify.

http://kassiesa.home.xs4all.nl/bert/uefa/data/method4/trank2016.html

 

ie. the last five seasons up to and including 2015/16.

We are in 267th place.

 

-----------------------------------

 

The access list is determined by numbers collated by the five seasons up to and including 2014/15.

http://kassiesa.home.xs4all.nl/bert/uefa/access2016.html

 

 

I always thought that it was the previous year's coeffs as this years are still being calculated. Has it changed?

 

It makes a massive difference as we achieved about 12 points in 2011 with Walter - and five since. 113 to 267 is a huge drop.

[Bearman 9]

That is for the First qualifying round.

 

Scottish Cup winners go in at the second round.

 

Ahh I see ,...told you I hadn't a clue

[calscot 0]

If you look in the qualification for 16/17 page it says:

 

23 Scotland 17.900---------------------------------------- CL1= (ch/Q2) CW= (eu/Q2) EL2= (eu/Q1) EL3= (eu/Q1)

 

That says Scotland's coeff is 17.900

 

Now the country ranking for 2015 is:

 

[TABLE=class: t1, width: 100%]

[TR]

[TD]22[/TD]

[TD=align: left]Denmark[/TD]

[TD]6.700[/TD]

[TD]3.100[/TD]

[TD]3.300[/TD]

[TD]3.800[/TD]

[TD]2.900[/TD]

[TD]19.800[/TD]

[TD]5[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]23[/TD]

[TD=align: left]Scotland[/TD]

[TD]3.600[/TD]

[TD]2.750[/TD]

[TD]4.300[/TD]

[TD]3.250[/TD]

[TD]4.000[/TD]

[TD]17.900[/TD]

[TD]4[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]24[/TD]

[TD=align: left]Sweden[/TD]

[TD]2.600[/TD]

[TD]2.900[/TD]

[TD]5.125[/TD]

[TD]3.200[/TD]

[TD]3.900[/TD]

[TD]17.725[/TD]

[TD]5

[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

 

and 2016:

 

[TABLE=class: t1, width: 100%]

[TR]

[TD]24[/TD]

[TD=align: left]Denmark[/TD]

[TD]3.100[/TD]

[TD]3.300[/TD]

[TD]3.800[/TD]

[TD]2.900[/TD]

[TD]5.500[/TD]

[TD]18.600[/TD]

[TD]4[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]25[/TD]

[TD=align: left]Scotland[/TD]

[TD]2.750[/TD]

[TD]4.300[/TD]

[TD]3.250[/TD]

[TD]4.000[/TD]

[TD]3.000[/TD]

[TD]17.300[/TD]

[TD]4[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]26[/TD]

[TD=align: left]Azerbaijan[/TD]

[TD]1.375[/TD]

[TD]3.000[/TD]

[TD]2.500[/TD]

[TD]3.625[/TD]

[TD]4.375[/TD]

[TD]14.875[/TD]

[TD]4[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

 

So need to check further...

[buster. 4,974]

I always thought that it was the previous year's coeffs as this years are still being calculated. Has it changed?

 

It makes a massive difference as we achieved about 12 points in 2011 with Walter - and five since. 113 to 267 is a huge drop.

 

It's always been the same.

 

The numbers from the year you used (us in 113th) can be found in the seeding list for the events of last season.

 

The year you used

http://kassiesa.home.xs4all.nl/bert/uefa/data/method4/trank2015.html / link 1

 

EL seedings for last season

http://kassiesa.home.xs4all.nl/bert/uefa/seedel2015.html / link 2

 

eg. Look at any team and it's seeding co-efficient in link 2......and you'll find it corresponds to the year you were using in link 1.

[calscot 0]

I think you're right as Lisbon have the coeff for 2016...