Bluedell 5,471 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 It's a footballing related debt so oldco/newco doesn't really come into it. Also newco have agreed to pay it so I don't see that we have any option but to pay. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,471 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 the argumets are irrelevant until the fraud case and tax hearing are concluded. I don't think they are relevant in this case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 I thought the contention was that football debts are expected to be paid but prize money and transfer money in the other direction has been with withheld. We are the same club but they are deliberately picking and choosing the company when it comes to money owed and money due. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,471 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 I thought the contention was that football debts are expected to be paid but prize money and transfer money in the other direction has been with withheld. We are the same club but they are deliberately picking and choosing the company when it comes to money owed and money due. Yeah, we were blackmailed and shafted by the SFA. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,453 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 (edited) There are 2 elephants in the room in Scottish Football at the moment: Whyte getting convicted of a fraudulent takeover & Rangers winning the EBT appeal at the supreme court Edited March 29, 2016 by RANGERRAB 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 Yeah, we were blackmailed and shafted by the SFA. yes and green agreed to it and is on trial for fraud 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,453 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 When the Crown Office ordered their investigation the Scottish Football Authorities should have suspended all of the punishments for Rangers 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,471 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 yes and green agreed to it and is on trial for fraud The 2 are unrelated, as far as I'm aware. Every transaction that Green entered as a director of the club does not fall away if he gets found guilty of fraud. We still own Edmiston House, Lee Wallace is still our player and we still have unfortunately agreed to pay the SFA the cash. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,471 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 When the Crown Office ordered their investigation the Scottish Football Authorities should have suspended all of the punishments for Rangers The investigations don't have anything to do with Rangers not disclosing the EBT side letters to the SFA. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,453 Posted March 29, 2016 Share Posted March 29, 2016 The investigations don't have anything to do with Rangers not disclosing the EBT side letters to the SFA. I was thinking more of the other punishments we got. As for the EBT's they were in the annual accounts every year although I do think we mayend up having to pay this fine 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.