plgsarmy 111 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 If you can confirm that the figures are wrong, tell us what the correct figures are and put this nonsense to bed. Why not wait for the final proposal? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Why not wait for the final proposal? Since you appear to be privy to the information now, why not let the punters know now, and save any confusion being allowed to manifest itself? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 (edited) You know full well I wasn't the source of any complaint against you. However you did complain to Rangers about me prior to the election for the initial board. You are correct that I complained about you because you were making critical posts about a fellow candidate in the election. Did you not previously deny any knowledge of the complaint against forlanssister? The complaint lodged in the run-up to the Rangers Fans Board election? Edited February 14, 2016 by Zappa 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 can one of the RF candidates answer this? is it true if we merge that only 45% money raised will go to the purchase of Shares? 45% will go to RIFC? Rest to Administration costs Bh said it was a 50/50 split on shares and the club getting it's share? Something has happened that is scaring off guys, that were previously favourable to the merger? One does wonder why Gough and the good Reverend, who had no previous links, apart from endorsements, to the RF, now want to join the RF board. Is a hostile takeover of RF being implemented? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plgsarmy 111 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Since you appear to be privy to the information now, why not let the punters know now, and save any confusion being allowed to manifest itself? It would be like bringing out a book before the end has been written. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 0 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 It would be like bringing out a book before the end has been written. Can you give me the break down of how many reps for each group? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plgsarmy 111 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Can you give me the break down of how many reps for each group? Three from RST, three from RF, two from Association, two from Assembly and two from the RFB. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 0 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 Three from RST, three from RF, two from Association, two from Assembly and two from the RFB. What's Plan B if RF members say No? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plgsarmy 111 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 What's Plan B if RF members say No? I assume they will remain as a separate group. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted February 14, 2016 Share Posted February 14, 2016 You'd almost think that this was being put about by people against the new group. Luckily I can confirm that the figures are wrong. What amuses me though is when RF was being set up we were told that it was so much more flexible than just buying shares. It would be like bringing out a book before the end has been written. "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." - Edmund Burke. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.