craig 5,199 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 UEFA do not prohibit dual ownership AFAIK. For the simple reason it would never stand up in a law court. HAHAHAHAHA.... So.... If the SFA haul us up over dual ownership you are suggesting that the Club take the SFA to court to prevent the imposed sanctions (I assume this is what you are suggesting given your reference to law courts) ? The very thought of the Club, with Dave King at the helm, in legal proceedings should be abhorred, no ? The very same thing you didn't want the Club to partake in you are now suggesting we would partake in, in the event the SFA punish us over dual ownership. Laughable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,471 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Looked into it ? LOL Why didn't they do anything about it? OK, charged us with breaking 3 rules and fined us £5,500, if you want it more exact. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,459 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 OK, charged us with breaking 3 rules and fined us £5,500, if you want it more exact. Regards Ashley voting at previous AGM's? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,459 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 HAHAHAHAHA.... So.... If the SFA haul us up over dual ownership you are suggesting that the Club take the SFA to court to prevent the imposed sanctions (I assume this is what you are suggesting given your reference to law courts) ? The very thought of the Club, with Dave King at the helm, in legal proceedings should be abhorred, no ? The very same thing you didn't want the Club to partake in you are now suggesting we would partake in, in the event the SFA punish us over dual ownership. Laughable. The SFA can't charge us with dual ownership. As I've explained on here (umpteen times) Ashley has a shareholding limit imposed by the SFA which he hasn't exceeded to my knowledge. He breached SFA rules by appointing L&L 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,471 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Regards Ashley voting at previous AGM's? For breaching rules 1 & 19, which would cover voting at an AGM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,471 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 The SFA can't charge us with dual ownership. As I've explained on here (umpteen times) Ashley has a shareholding limit imposed by the SFA which he hasn't exceeded to my knowledge. He breached SFA rules by appointing L&L We were fined £500 for the L&L, and we were fined £5K for the other stuff. Try telling the SFA that they can't charge us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,459 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 We were fined £500 for the L&L, and we were fined £5K for the other stuff. Try telling the SFA that they can't charge us. What 'other stuff' is that ? Are you saying Ashley voted at the 2013 & 14 AGM's & we got fined £5K as a result ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 King has picked a fight with someone with far greater power & wealth than he has & it is RANGERS who are suffering as a result There are time, more often than not, that David MUST take on Goliath for what is RIGHT. Your post above suggests that Dave King shouldn't fight this legal battle simply because Ashley has far greater power & wealth. That is a ridiculous suggestion if the Club has appropriate legal recourse. I personally APPLAUD Dave King & the Board of RFC for standing up for the Club and taking on a monumental (in terms of wealth) foe. If we don't stand up for our rights then we risk being trampled over. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 (edited) ashley was fined £7500 later dropped to £1000 which he is still contesting at court as far as i am aware. The club was fined £5k for 3 breaches of rules one of which was bringing the game into disrepute or something along the lines of not in the best interest of football if my memory serves. The fines have nothing to do with shares they were for control of management or administration at two clubs without prior written consent. You can have control of two clubs you just need to have permission from the sfa first. Edited January 27, 2016 by trublusince1982 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,471 Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 What 'other stuff' is that ? Are you saying Ashley voted at the 2013 & 14 AGM's & we got fined £5K as a result ? FFS. Why are you so pro-Ashley? Surely doing anything to limit his influence is good? Also not sure why you need it so exact. The club were fined for bad faith. which could happen again if Ashley is allowed to vote at an AGM. What has happened in the past isn't that relevant, but who's to say what happens in the future if Ashley increases his shareholding, something the club are powerless to prevent. However they can stop him and those who he influences form voting. And yes, Ashley voted for the appointment of Llambias at an AGM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.