Spiers and The Herald have a slice of humble pie.

[Frankie 8,652]

I thought it was an excellent statement and captured my feelings and opinions perfectly.

[Scott7 6,164]

I will say one thing before bed though...The RST are quite right in everything they said and it was carefully worded...that's all folks.

 

Carefully worded it was not. Some forensic anaysis should be applied before publication.

 

In this sort of combat the stiletto beats the bludgeon.

[pete 2,499]

I thought it was an excellent statement and captured my feelings and opinions perfectly.

 

It certainly captures Rangers minded feelings that is for sure. It would be perfect for a Rangers Fanzine.

Not a great statement for the open press though and our enemies are already all over it.

[Frankie 8,652]

It certainly captures Rangers minded feelings that is for sure. It would be perfect for a Rangers Fanzine.

Not a great statement for the open press though and our enemies are already all over it.

 

I don't see the issue with it - unlike Spiers and Haggerty, the RST could easily prove any claim they make in it.

 

If I had one complaint I'd say it was too long and I think that's probably why they've decided not to include examples of their claims alongside it.

[rbr 1,266]

Don't see any problem with the statement , they dealt factually with both Spiers and the Hag , and if someone hates you they hate you , we need to isolate these arseholes not pander to them .

[the gunslinger 3,366]

I'm with Frankie here. Excellent stuff.

[Anchorman 0]

Maybe the RST should get a hold of the software used by that 'pillar of integrity', Spiers, to post 20,000 'likes' online against the statement. You know the one he used to create 20,000 fake Russian Twitter followers?

[aweebluesoandso 290]

I don't see the issue with it - unlike Spiers and Haggerty, the RST could easily prove any claim they make in it.

 

If I had one complaint I'd say it was too long and I think that's probably why they've decided not to include examples of their claims alongside it.

 

I agree Frankie, it's a statement of the fact's, if any one wishes to contest it there are procedures in law to challenge it. Unlike Spiers i'm sure the RST could produce the evidence to back up their claims. Besides who nitpickers and splits hairs about a statement from our own supporters group? Erm some on here it would seem. The vast majority of the support over the Rangers social media forums agree with it wholeheartedly, the evidence is there to back up that statement just go on the forums and see for yourselves, yes there are some hand-wringers moaning, but you get them everywhere.

Edited February 1, 2016 by aweebluesoandso

[onevision 1,595]

It's a statement of facts and a good one at that, nothing more nothing less.

[pete 2,499]

I agree Frankie, it's a statement of the fact's, if any one wishes to contest it there are procedures in law to challenge it. Unlike Spiers i'm sure the RST could produce the evidence to back up their claims. Besides who nick picks and splits hairs about a statement from our own supporters group? Erm some on here it would seem. The vast majority of the support over the Rangers social media forums agree with it wholeheartedly, the evidence is there to back up that statement just go on the forums and see for yourselves, yes there are some hand-wringers moaning, but you get them everywhere.

 

Yeh I am a hand- wringer because I disagree with a statement. Why are you a hand- wringer then? Or are you just a bum chum that nods at everything.