ian1964 10,826 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 1m1 minute ago As mentioned previously, SD currently discussing the detail of how the notice of order was served. Copy to all Rangers directors. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 30s31 seconds ago Judge: Mr King was never evasive. You [sD] made a conscious decision not to serve him out of jurisdiction (in South Africa). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 28s28 seconds ago SD: Decision made not to serve King with the order personally at a meeting. Order was simply left at home address of other directors. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 50s51 seconds ago Paraphrasing the judge: Effect is that if you establish a limited company is in the contempt... directors can be pursued. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 30s30 seconds ago Discussion between SD and judge continues to centre around how the order was served, who on and the responsibility of company directors. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 35s36 seconds ago SD: Did King act in a way which was breach of order? And in doing so was he doing so on behalf of Rangers? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 36s36 seconds ago Judge: Start with the revelation of the discussions. 1 retweet 0 likes Grant Russell @STVGrant 52s52 seconds ago Judge: You've got to persuade me he was in breach because he discussed the contents of certain discussions. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 58s58 seconds ago Judge asks if SD leaked details of meeting to press. SD say no. Judge asks if Mr Ashley has said so on oath. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,439 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 58s58 seconds ago Judge asks if SD leaked details of meeting to press. SD say no. Judge asks if Mr Ashley has said so on oath. Ask the list of second rate relayers of spin. #PMGBetc 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,826 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 54s54 seconds ago Judge: Does Mike not communicate with the press sometimes? We don't know that Mike didn't leak it. Just that Justin Barnes is unaware of it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.