buster. 4,974 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 You guys have the tweets on the website before they even show for me on the Grant Russell twitter page. #wilderness 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,367 Posted December 10, 2015 Author Share Posted December 10, 2015 Ian is actually Grant Russell.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,613 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 55s55 seconds ago Judge: Natural remedy for any breach of contract is damages. SD: I have to differ in your view. Judge: You show me authority. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RabiDuck 89 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Reading through it all, the tone of the judge (even through the tweets) is getting more and more exasperated. Any chance he might just throw the whole thing out and bring the documents into public domain using judicial privilege? (if such a thing exists...) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,974 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 (edited) Ian is actually Grant Russell.... I thought Ian was Mr. Ian Reuters ! ps. Both Ian and Grant are doing sterling work. Edited December 10, 2015 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,613 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Ian is actually Grant Russell.... SHhhhhhhhhhh! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,613 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 37s38 seconds ago Judge: Prospect of real harm if contents of meetings put in public domain. "Staggered" want King in prison for revealing existence of talks 1 retweet 1 like 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 SD QC getting a rebuke from the judge, by the sounds of it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,613 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 29s29 seconds ago Judge: I am with you 100% on enforcing confidentiality agreement on King putting private matters in public domain. Not at the moment. 0 retweets 0 likes Grant Russell @STVGrant 52s52 seconds ago Judge: I've been talking to you for the last 40 minutes about the existence of the meeting. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,974 Posted December 10, 2015 Share Posted December 10, 2015 Reading through it all, the tone of the judge (even through the tweets) is getting more and more exasperated. Any chance he might just throw the whole thing out and bring the documents into public domain using judicial privilege? (if such a thing exists...) Judge has done his homework and pretty much knows what is going on here. What he can do I don't know, nor what he will do but as it stands, odds on DK eating Turkey at home are extremely short. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.