Court of Session rules in favour of HMRC + Rangers Issue Statement

[ian1964 10,761]

So they've won an appeal, what happens next?

 

Where does this leave us?

[onevision 1,595]

The statement suggests that we will be fighting for our titles again, here we fucking go again.

[Frankie 8,664]

They've won the right to appeal.

[boabie 230]

Summary here:

 

http://www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk/9/0/Summaries-of-Court-Opinions

 

This link takes us directly to the announcement; http://www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk/9/1514/Advocate-General-for-Scotland-v-Murray-Group-Holdings-and-others

[BlueMazza 0]

I'm lost. Do they have to appeal, to appeal the judgement? What nonsense is this?

[ian1964 10,761]

By Grant Russell

 

Court of Session rules Rangers EBT payments 'were emoluments or earnings'

 

http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/1331969-court-of-session-rules-rangers-ebt-payments-were-emoluments-or-earnings/

[ian1964 10,761]

Does all this means oldco creditors receive nothing?,doesn't really affect us now?

[jhunter 0]

Does all this means oldco creditors receive nothing?,doesn't really affect us now?

 

it will rev up the Rangers cheated campaign and have the vermin foaming at the mouth wanting tiles removed.

[BlueMazza 0]

it will rev up the Rangers cheated campaign and have the vermin foaming at the mouth wanting tiles removed.

 

But they haven't won the case, they haven't proven anything. As far as I can tell, they've won the right to appeal the original ruling. What I want to know is, does the ruling get thrown out if the appeal wins, or is a whole new trial required?

[jhunter 0]

But they haven't won the case, they haven't proven anything. As far as I can tell, they've won the right to appeal the original ruling. What I want to know is, does the ruling get thrown out if the appeal wins, or is a whole new trial required?

 

We accordingly conclude that the primary argument presented for HMRC is correct: the payments made by the respondents to the Trustee of the Principal Trust in respect of employees were emoluments or earnings and are accordingly subject to income tax. Furthermore, those payments were made at the time of payment to the trustee of the Principal Trust, with the result that the obligation to deduct tax under the PAYE system fell on the employer who made such a payment.”

 

I would imagine its re heard with shit like this presented as evidence.