der Berliner 4,107 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant · 4m4 minutes ago RIFC: There are comments from Charles Green himself that he was referring to "the club". Grant Russell @STVGrant · 4m4 minutes ago Lord Doherty: there are two arguments. It could be that the club is a club; or that it is a limited company Grant Russell @STVGrant · 4m4 minutes ago Lord Doherty says Rangers response to complaint over "most successful club" was not a letter of admission Grant Russell @STVGrant · 4m4 minutes ago Lord Doherty asks whether the club v company debate is one he can deal with without evidence. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 4,107 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) NB: Comments snatched from this FF thread http://forum.followfollow.com/showthread.php?1068813-Charles-Green-case-in-court-tomorrow/page4 NB 2: Is Lord Doherty opening the club vs company debate up again? Edited November 12, 2015 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 NB: Comments snatched from this FF thread http://forum.followfollow.com/showthread.php?1068813-Charles-Green-case-in-court-tomorrow/page4 NB 2: Is Lord Doherty opening the club vs company debate up again? Looks very much like it.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 4,107 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Seems we have introduced this particular argument, it is the first of the quoted ones (haven't got any earlier tweets though) Grant Russell @STVGrant RIFC now arguing that Sevco Scotland "acquired The Rangers Football Club", which it owns and operates. Making club v company distinction. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 (edited) Looks very much like it.... This argument was lead by our QC Wolfe, think he is trying to argue business V club, Savo was the business that Green owned, which had the insurance and indemnity, but the club RIFC didn't, I think. Edited November 12, 2015 by aweebluesoandso 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 4,107 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 STV Grant has a dig at Timmy........ Grant Russell @STVGrant · 4m4 minutes ago The sheer volume of legal eagles sending constructive comments my way today is astonishing. Don't you have clients to see? Ffer's remark: Never fails to amaze me the amount of legal, corporate and financial experts we have in the methadone and crisis loan queues 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Ffer's remark: Never a truer word spoken. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 4,107 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Grant Russell @STVGrant 1m1 minute ago CG lawyer appears to have a copy of the original Rangers articles of association to hand. Grant Russell @STVGrant 1m1 minute ago CG lawyer: From 1872 until 1899, articles of association show Rangers the club was unincorporated. Grant Russell @STVGrant 9m9 minutes ago CG lawyer: Costs decision can't wait until end of the trial. Can't be based on an outcome which may not come to pass Grant Russell @STVGrant 7s8 seconds ago Lord Doherty says he will "take some time to consider before issuing decision in writing". The Court is told Green seeking funding for senior counsel, junior counsel, solicitors and any experts senior counsel wishes to call. Green's counsel is arguing that would impact how many legal beagles he would hire for the trial. If on his own dime it would be fewer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.