calscot 0 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 All the best Rangers players these days, seem to be the ones that don't get a game... If you extrapolate the league tables till the end of season, he could be playing the division below us next season. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno55 0 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 How come when you make a comment on here some smart a--se with attitude comes on and tries to belittle You? Is that the way you speak to fellow gers fans? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 How come when you make a comment on here some smart a--se with attitude comes on and tries to belittle You? Is that the way you speak to fellow gers fans? I don't think he was trying to belittle you but it was indeed a pretty stern reply. Ally and the players leaving has left a few sore spots. Some people do get het up about it. I personally think the difference is that we got a fee for Telfor whereas Naismith and co walked for free while still under contract making use of the situation at that time. Personally I disagree with John as I don't think you can liken 2 different situations. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,266 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Where's elfidido with his superb match reports 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno55 0 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Cheers Pete can you answer me this, who would have benefited if we got money for naismith, Whitaker ect?... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Cheers Pete can you answer me this, who would have benefited if we got money for naismith, Whitaker ect?... Probably out the same door as much of the other 70 million. Greens Lawyers bill? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Quote Originally Posted by Bruno55 View PostCheers Pete can you answer me this, who would have benefited if we got money for naismith, Whitaker ect?... Probably out the same door as much of the other 70 million. Greens Lawyers bill? What would have happened to the money is not really the point though as that was in hindsight. We never got a chance to do anything good with the money. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno55 0 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 So we're they wrong not to give green more money Pete? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 So we're they wrong not to give green more money Pete? Only in hindsight. They had no idea what Green was like. The honourable thing to do for the club would have been to sign on again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Only in hindsight. They had no idea what Green was like. The honourable thing to do for the club would have been to sign on again. The story from some who knew what was happening at the time is, the players were left totally out in the cold by Green. Nobody could contact him to find out his plans. Then Green hit the papers saying the players belonged to him and were going nowhere. That was when the union got involved. Apparently even Wishart had a hard task trying to contact Green. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.