Craigy1881 79 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 :celebrate::clap::jump::party: this just made me laugh out loud 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Guy in my work is a killie fan and has just had a text saying zaluskas is having a medical just now If that's true, then it's going to leave us short of central defenders, so presumably the manager will look to add another. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg_Mcnoleg 50 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Good to get Zaliuskas off the books though if his move is at the same speed as he plays he could still be at Ibrox at Christmas 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,830 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 (edited) Guy in my work is a killie fan and has just had a text saying zaluskas is having a medical just now Jeez I thought McCoist was the worst manager ever, but Locke is running him a close second. Edited August 24, 2015 by BEARGER 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 If that's true, then it's going to leave us short of central defenders, so presumably the manager will look to add another. Even if he stays it will leave us short of a defender. At least it will be cheaper without him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,266 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 This is still unconfirmed so could be utter gash 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Even if he stays it will leave us short of a defender. At least it will be cheaper without him. no it won't. We'd have to pay up his contract until the end of the season 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 Etymonline I think, this does not cover it, as you probably simply did not add the "rotten" to "rank"? And that is one of those moments where you wish people would actually start and use their language, as more often than not, we end up with bipolar stuff that simply is "rank" ... and does not leave much leeway to either side. For if McGregor was "rank", what was McCulloch, Cribari, Mohsni or some other "failures" by comparison. Rank rank? And obviously, neither was McGregor rank as a defender, nor was he worse with the ball at his feet. He is no Kolarov, Ivanovic or Leighton Baines. But please give the lad the credit he deserves. 'tis a common word round our way as for in comparison to people who were worse than him then words like awful and woeful were well worn all through last season, don't really see the controversy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 'tis a common word round our way Been quite common for quite a while mate. 'Rank' as you say means 'rotten' it stems from 'The Rank Organisation' founded by industrialist J. Arthur Rank which produced awful British made films during the 30's 40's 50's 60's and 70's. We used to say (when one dropped one) "You are J Arthur Rank"...this was later whittled down to a simple "You are Rank" 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted August 24, 2015 Share Posted August 24, 2015 no it won't. We'd have to pay up his contract until the end of the season Not if it is by mutual consent as McGregor did. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.