Gribz 889 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 He found his level last season. Its as good as it will get as far as his career goes. Good point. Dundee Utd didn't sell him to Hibs for no reason and he was playing Cowdenbeath, Alloa and Livingston last season. Very good point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 Good point. Dundee Utd didn't sell him to Hibs for no reason and he was playing Cowdenbeath, Alloa and Livingston last season. Very good point. Think he went to West Brom from Dundee Utd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 That would be why Allan had a picture of himself in a Rangers strip on instagram until a few days ago? They knew they would win because they knew petrie would play ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,701 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 Think he went to West Brom from Dundee Utd. And never played a single first team game for WBA. Was loaned out to one club after another until his contract ran out & signed for hibz Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,701 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 They knew they would win because they knew petrie would play ball. I would like to know why it was hibz(or was it stubz) were so adamant they wouldn't sell Allan to Rangers. Was it because Rangers are 'rivals' in the same division? Does that therefore mean if/when they're back in the top division they will not sell a player to any club in that division? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 (edited) I would like to know why it was hibz(or was it stubz) were so adamant they wouldn't sell Allan to Rangers.Was it because Rangers are 'rivals' in the same division? Does that therefore mean if/when they're back in the top division they will not sell a player to any club in that division? You would assume so. But it's a tad more specific. One of us and hibs will win this league and the other come second. Hibs were absolutely correct not to sell to us. If the player really wanted to come to us he had to wait. It obviously wasn't that important to him. Edited August 16, 2015 by the gunslinger Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 Gough's only got part of it right. Yes, he must have been badly advised, but there's also the money side of it for the lad personally and last, but probably not least, the fact that the lad's as thick as mince. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,728 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 I would like to know why it was hibz(or was it stubz) were so adamant they wouldn't sell Allan to Rangers.Was it because Rangers are 'rivals' in the same division? Does that therefore mean if/when they're back in the top division they will not sell a player to any club in that division? Gordon Waddell: If field of Scottish football is fertile enough for Celts to sign up best, why can’t they grow their own? http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/gordon-waddell-field-scottish-football-6257545 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,728 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 Gordon Waddle Tweeting Ph-ill About Record Article Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted August 16, 2015 Share Posted August 16, 2015 Gordon Waddle Tweeting Ph-ill About Record Article Great response. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts