Jump to content

 

 

Rangers Put Stewart Robertson Up For A Place On SPFL Board


Recommended Posts

Gordon Waddell: The SPFL agm may sound dull but tomorrow's gathering at Hampden promises to be a bun fight.

 

GORDON expects there to be fall-out from tomorrow's SPFL showdown as Hearts, Hibs and Rangers attempt to install their choice of candidates on the board of directors.

 

THE SPFL agm. Nownormally you’d rather remove your own eyeball with a rusty ice-cream scoop than endure its tedium.

 

Tomorrow, though? Take a seat and break out the popcorn. It’s about to get messy.

 

Maybe not during it. Definitely after.

 

Because whatever happens at their election of board members this year, whoever wins and more importantly whoever loses, there’ll be recriminations.

 

Six are elected annually – not exactly a recipe for stability, but hey, it’s the SPFL, what else do you expect?

 

Three from the top flight, two from the Championship, one from Leagues One and Two. A make-up supposedly there for balance, a check for the vested interests of the big clubs against the rest.

 

Since its inception, we’ve seen different faces from the lower league clubs but the top three have stayed the same - Celtic’s Eric Riley, Aberdeen director Duncan Fraser and Dundee United chairman Stephen Thompson, all resisting a half-hearted challenge last year.

 

This time? The gloves are off – and there are two bouts on the card.

 

Only the excellent Ken Ferguson from Brechin stands unopposed for his place.

 

In the Premiership, Hearts’ Ann Budge and Jim Mann from Killie are taking on the incumbents.

 

And in the Championship, Rangers and Hibs have both decided it’s time they flexed against the diddy clubs, Stewart Robertson and Rod Petrie stepping in to take out Alloa’s Mike Mulraney and Eric Drysdale form Raith Rovers. Except the chances are NONE of them will shift the current lot. Which is good news and bad news.

 

If you’re on any board of directors or trustees, you ask yourself why you’re there. So if you’re sitting on the SPFL board, there should be priorities to any decision you take, right? Those being:

 

1. The overall good of the game

 

2. The wellbeing of the 42 clubs you’re there to represent

 

3. The interests of the 10 or 12 clubs in the division you’ve been elected to represent.

 

4. Your club.

 

But let’s face it, some of them – and we all know who we’re talking about – have that list arse over elbow.

 

Which is why Ann Budge would be a popular choice for 99 per cent of football fans. Because most of us believe that she has a fresh eye, a bit of perspective on the league’s shortcomings. That she’s a big picture type, not a ‘How does this affect ME?’ voter.

 

Yet it’s also why she won’t get in. Like it or not, this is about politics. To us she’s a yes, but who’s she going to displace? Everyone needs eight votes from 12 to get on, and she’s done little, if any, lobbying.

 

I actually get the feeling she knows it. And that she stands to make more capital out of NOT winning.

 

If she doesn’t shift any of the old boy network, questions will be asked. Why the fear of a woman’s voice? Why the fear of what most of us know is a voice of reason?

 

Which is ironic, considering how much time I understand they’ve put – unsuccessfully – into trying to find a female non-exec director in the past two years, when they have a perfectly good exec one right under their noses.

 

But defeat will give her the opportunity to garner even more popularity from the people who believe her voice should be heard.

 

And it should – but there should be other mechanisms. There are other eminently sensible voices in the game, like Roy MacGregor, who aren’t on the board and therefore aren’t heard enough. It’s not as if the game is being run so well that it doesn’t need fresh ideas, fresh input.

 

As for the other fight? Robertson and Petrie will both lose, for any number of reasons.

 

One is that there’s no way the rest of the Championship clubs, your Falkirks and Livis and Queen of the Souths will believe for a minute that either of them will be there to represent anyone’s interests but their own.

 

Another is that amnesia won’t have kicked in enough for them to think Rangers have done enough to earn a place at the top table, irrespective of Robertson’s popularity as an individual.

 

And Petrie? The guy who said he would be taking a back seat when he appointed Leeann Dempster? Aye, right.

 

Not content with his vice presidency of the SFA, he can’t resist sticking his neb in. Why?

 

Considering each of them need seven of 10 votes, I’d be staggered if either won the day.

 

Which, unlike my colleague Mick Gannon, I actually think’s a good thing.

 

In his midweek column in the Record, he reckoned the ‘Big 5’ should have a permanent seat and a permanent say in how the game’s run.

 

Brilliant. A set of clubs who’ve presided over the single worst downturn in the history of Scottish football because of their arrogance and self-interest in the 17 years since the inception of the SPL, all back in charge of the new

train set?

 

What could possibly go wrong?

 

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/gordon-waddell-spfl-agm-sound-6095858

Link to post
Share on other sites

lost with this comment.......

Another is that amnesia won’t have kicked in enough for them to think Rangers have done enough to earn a place at the top table, irrespective of Robertson’s popularity as an individual.

 

dont we do enough by carrying the tv deal pretty much on our shoulders? maybe we should send out the viewing figures as Mr Robertsons running agenda

Edited by trublusince1982
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO, the current SPFL (and SFA) board setup is a mixture of a Scottish clan feast of the bad old days and FIFA. And has been for years. In that respect, Waddell is correct. Still, no matter what others may think (primarily of themselves), it is fact that essentially only two teams carry Scottish football along, be it crowd numbers or TV audiences (and thus deals). Anyone trying to challenge this opinion is simply ignoring reality. One just has to look at the amount of TV games we have been burdened with in the first three months of next season alone. So anyone expecting us to sit back and let it all happen without having a say is challenging our intelligence.

Edited by der Berliner
Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't argue about the subject of TV viewing figures, but the bottom line is that we'd probably have had a better chance of getting a seat on the SPFL board if we'd managed to get promoted last season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

someone with time on their hands should count the percentage of tickets within scottish football that are bought by Rangers fans(home and away) and how much of tv audience by percentage watched games that Rangers contested. Then they can send it to whatever moron wrote that piece and ask who is doing more for scottish football?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Budge and Robertson fail to get elected on to the SPFL BOARD.

 

Quelle surprise, corrupt to the core.

 

Ever since SDM abandoned ship a few years ago and we had no representation at the SFA & the then SPL we've seen Liewell & his chums take over. It will take many years yet before anything changes unfortunately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.