The Sea Captain 0 Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 (edited) The Blue Order @TBO_Official 1m1 minute agoTBO is currently in discussions with RFC over plans for next season and a block of ST renewals. No screenshot required for that. Screen shot removed Edited June 24, 2015 by Frankie 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,652 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 (edited) Just to be very clear before this thread is re-opened. This forum will not tolerate private information being shared publicly. It's an absolute disgrace that bears are sharing such stuff online. Good news is that TBO will still be around next season and no amount of mischief-making and childish slurs will change that. Edited June 24, 2015 by Frankie 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,429 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 You are just pissed off because they don't conform to the ideal of what a Rangers supporter should be according to that wee (now defunct?) committee that you were a part of. You talk of 'stupid new songs' yet it was you who argued for many of the 'old songs' to be discarded by the support. Can't have it both ways. You are talking out a hole that shouldn't be used for talking i'm afraid. You know fine well what is meant by both stupid new songs, and our proud songbook of old songs that comply with our (stupid) new laws. It is not having it both ways, it is apples and oranges. The UB don't act like the Rangers supporters that I grew up with, in my experience of sitting beside them at certain away games over the last couple of years. My comments have absolutely nothing to do with how I worked with them (until they spat the dummy out as it wasn't "Ultra" enough to be seen to be working with the club and authorities) while i was part of the RFWG, when I defended them to the hilt on several occasions. I am delighted that the club have got the feedback that they are not wanted in CR and have scuppered that idea. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 (edited) You are talking out a hole that shouldn't be used for talking i'm afraid. You know fine well what is meant by both stupid new songs, and our proud songbook of old songs that comply with our (stupid) new laws. It is not having it both ways, it is apples and oranges. The UB don't act like the Rangers supporters that I grew up with, in my experience of sitting beside them at certain away games over the last couple of years. My comments have absolutely nothing to do with how I worked with them (until they spat the dummy out as it wasn't "Ultra" enough to be seen to be working with the club and authorities) while i was part of the RFWG, when I defended them to the hilt on several occasions. I am delighted that the club have got the feedback that they are not wanted in CR and have scuppered that idea. The UB are no different to any previous generation of young Bears that followed the club and others who don't like their ways are no different now to what they were like in the past. Edited June 24, 2015 by Rangersitis 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 Ditch the personal jibes and insults please guys. If you want to get personal with each other take it to private messages. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,652 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 Ditch the personal jibes and insults please guys. If you want to get personal with each other take it to private messages. a/s/l? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 a/s/l? Don't you start! I've got a birthday drinking session hangover today. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,429 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 The UB are no different to any previous generation of young Bears that followed the club and others who don't like their ways are no different now to what they were like in the past. We will have to agree to disagree on this one then if that is what you think, as I think pretty much the opposite and dont see the point of going round in circles again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 24, 2015 Share Posted June 24, 2015 We will have to agree to disagree on this one then if that is what you think, as I think pretty much the opposite and dont see the point of going round in circles again. Fair enough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted June 24, 2015 Author Share Posted June 24, 2015 Feel free to question the veracity of what the Union Bears have said. I'm not sure how I'm "confusing what the UB's have said in their statement with whom the club have actually written to, regarding the possibility of a move."(sic) Its not a question of veracity. The UB statment makes reference to a move to CR 1. It was ST Holders from CR1/CR3/CR4/CR5 who were all surveyed however by the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.