JTP 0 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 A question that needs answered is why did the board keep knowledge of these actions from fans groups and the fans many of whom are shareholders, not great at all. Did fat Mike give them a months notice? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Counsel for Sports Direct tells court tells court that motion relates to RFC EGM tomorrow Sports Direct counsel says he is seeking interim injunction to stop confidential information being releases at RFC EGM Sports Direct says RFC are willing to to pledge not to release confidentiality at EGM Counsel for Sports Direct says the pledge from RFC does not go far enough, does not cover "commercial conversations" Sports Direct asking judge for injunction to stop RFC disclosing confidential commercial contracts 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,665 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) A question that needs answered is why did the board keep knowledge of these actions from fans groups and the fans many of whom are shareholders, not great at all. A question that needs answered is why is Mike Ashley wanting to keep these retail deal details from fans and shareholders... Edited June 11, 2015 by Frankie 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 A question that needs answered is why is Mike Ashley wanting to keep these retail deal details from fans and shareholders... and why do some supporters back him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,665 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Let's sum up: 1. SD/MASH requisitions an EGM to get RIFC answers to retail questions. 2. SD/MASH then takes RIFC to court so these answers can't be given at EGM Meanwhile the club has to pay out six figure sums in meeting/legal costs. What a fantastic retail partner to have... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,665 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 and why do some supporters back him. There's no genuine Rangers fan who genuinely backs this chancer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Counsel for Sports Direct says RFC not willing to keep "IP" negations confidential at EGM RFC consel says that they will agree to keep some parts of contracts confidential. ||Sports Direct lawyer: "this does not go far enough" Sports Direct Counsel "Rangers got into financial difficulties in 2012" SD agreed to deal which included confidentiality about arrangements The content of any discussions, "past and future" should remain confidential SD counsel tells judge Judge queries the idea that "the existence of discussions" should remain secret "I am slightly at a loss on how this covers future discussions" Judge says to SD counsel "Discussions are taking place and will continue to take place" SD counsel tells court 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Judge queries the idea that "the existence of discussions" should remain secret 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 There's no genuine Rangers fan who genuinely backs this chancer. it seems Raygun does. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,665 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 it seems Raygun does. Raygun/quattro/wabash or whatever user-name he has next is just doing the bidding of others. He's gone now... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.