the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Hope he loses and the shock kills him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSolace 0 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Funny it is through an English court. You would have thought we fall under Scottish law. Precisely what i was thinking unless it is under wider British corporate law or to do with registration at Companies House.... Might be challenging us over AIM de-listing ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Precisely what i was thinking unless it is under wider British corporate law or to do with registration at Companies House.... Might be challenging us over AIM de-listing ? Ashely is up to something that is for sure. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Precisely what i was thinking unless it is under wider British corporate law or to do with registration at Companies House.... Might be challenging us over AIM de-listing ? Sports Direct are not shareholders so i doubt it is to do with Aim. Sports Direct are only in to the retail side of things. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Sports Direct are not shareholders so i doubt it is to do with Aim. Sports Direct are only in to the retail side of things. it'll be more likely to ensure confidentiality for the onerous contracts at Friday's GM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 it'll be more likely to ensure confidentiality for the onerous contracts at Friday's GM. If so it is a good way to attract votes. We want you to trust us and vote in our favour but we don't want anyone to get insight into our contracts which were engineered by our General and his lieutenants, 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Tramps like Ashley should not be allowed anywhere near football clubs....He may well be a billionaire but he would not turn his nose up at 5 quid let alone 5 million.....these people are money obsessed sociopaths Rangers are the 'wee guy' up against the billionaire in this situation, generally the 'big guy' wins and the big guy knows this. I wonder how much kicking us he'll get away with. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSolace 0 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Rangers are the 'wee guy' up against the billionaire in this situation, generally the 'big guy' wins and the big guy knows this. I wonder how much kicking us he'll get away with. It is small comfort but I reckon Fat Boy's ego is hurting and he has been outmanoeuvred, shocked to have lost control and is now throwing the toys out the pram ..... I say hold on to his 5m as long as possible .... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Funny it is through an English court. You would have thought we fall under Scottish law. The contract with SD will be stipulated as being under English law. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 The contract with SD will be stipulated as being under English law. Which makes it almost 100% certain that the case is to stop the board releasing any sensitive information in the contracts I would think. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.