raygun 0 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Who said cost was the hold up ? I believe it was a legitimate question, do you know what the hold up is in getting a listing I don't, hopefully all made clearer come Friday. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 We should just hold on to the 5 million for ever. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 I see, people are on the list who are still at other clubs yet the clubs haven't been spoken to, isn't that akin to tapping that is if we have spoken to these other candidates of course ? Tapping, of course not, that NEVER happens in football. You just speak to their agent instead. Can you tell what the reason is that does not allow any lender with a loan that has no conditions or repayment date not to call their loan on demand, if they so wish. Are we to believe that Ashley and his battery of accountants and legals have loaned money that they cannot call if they see fit and have effectively given away for security that they cannot call, I do not believe that for one moment. If the money was repayable at the moment, then it would have been demanded. The method being used by Ashley indicates that the loan agreement, doesn't get him what he wants just now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raygun 0 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 (edited) If the money was repayable at the moment, then it would have been demanded. The method being used by Ashley indicates that the loan agreement, doesn't get him what he wants just now. Why would it be demanded, as far as I can see he is asking shareholders if they want to continue with the present arrangement and all it entails and will abide by their decision, King on the other hand says he is not bound by shareholders decision at any ordinary resolution vote. Playing Russian roulette with our assets is not in my opinion a wise move. Edited June 9, 2015 by raygun 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 It's pretty obvious who raygun is. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Why would it be demanded, as far as I can see he is asking shareholders if they want to continue with the present arrangement and all it entails and will abide by their decision, King on the other hand says he is not bound by shareholders decision at any ordinary resolution vote. Guess you failed interpretation at school the resolution is for repayment of the £5 million. Legally the directors are correct...they would not be bound by the resolution Playing Russian roulette with our assets is not in my opinion a wise move. So long as the Club sticks to the loan agreement they assets are safe. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
raygun 0 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 So long as the Club sticks to the loan agreement they assets are safe. What is the loan agreement, no one seems to know. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 It's pretty obvious who raygun is. yep, slightly less irritating than heretofore, but yep 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 What is the loan agreement, no one seems to know. Clearly Ashley does. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
luke 0 Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Ashley has made a big mistake tangling with Dave King, he will chew him up and spit him out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.