Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 I'll repeat my points: McCoist has a better Win-rate, and joint-best loss-rate, but the performance on the park was poor; McDowall has the worst of all, but he did come up against the 'better' sides; McCall has an average win-rate, but joint-best loss-rate, and the performance is better. McCall has actually done better against the 'better' sides. I think it illustrates that they all have a similar record, if you extrapolate a full season. One's opinion of whom is best just depends on a subjective judgement on the performance on the park. I agree with this. I would assess Ally McCoist as being easily our worst ever manager, someone who just never should have been a manager. KMD was just a poor coach who became caretaker manager and didn't have a clue. McCall is a poor manager but quite a bit better than the previous two. I doubt we would have got anywhere near the playoff final under the previous two. Hopefully next season we make the required chances. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,803 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 I posted this in the other thread, but since you're talking about the managerial stats in here too it's quite interesting to look at them like this: McCoist: WLWWWWWWWDWLWWWWWWWWDLWLWLW McDowall: LWWLLLWDDD McCall: DDWWWLWDWDDWDWLL On a sidenote, we should not forget the dire football that was played under both McCoist and McDowall. People like to throw this up when not looking at the statistical facts and vice versa. The results may not reflect it, but at least we have seen them play football again after McCall came in ... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 On a sidenote, we should not forget the dire football that was played under both McCoist and McDowall. People like to throw this up when not looking at the statistical facts and vice versa. The results may not reflect it, but at least we have seen them play football again after McCall came in ... It's a results driven business. Better football which produces poorer results is not acceptable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,803 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 It's a results driven business. Better football which produces poorer results is not acceptable. No doubt about that. Just pointed out what happened beyond stats and why people think McCall might be the one for the job. Of course, bare results do not give you other variables, such as opposition, injuries, luck, blind refs and all that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,732 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 I agree with this. I would assess Ally McCoist as being easily our worst ever manager, someone who just never should have been a manager. KMD was just a poor coach who became caretaker manager and didn't have a clue. McCall is a poor manager but quite a bit better than the previous two. I doubt we would have got anywhere near the playoff final under the previous two. Hopefully next season we make the required chances. Had McCall not played for Rangers would he have been considered for interim manager ? I realise the incoming board had to act quickly to remove KMcD but McCall should not get beyond this season IMO. I simply do not see what he has got to offer judging by his past management record 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gisabeer 409 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 Id go for the qos manager. His side were very well organised and could play and pass the ball. If he can do that with a part time outfit and no money.... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,732 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 Id go for the qos manager. His side were very well organised and could play and pass the ball. If he can do that with a part time outfit and no money.... I think we'd have to show a bit more ambition than that with all due respect 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,803 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 (edited) Over on FF some "close to someone" people have heard that McLeish and Ale Rae (assistant) are mentioned. It has become rather quiet about Warburton and Weir too. Edited May 30, 2015 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 Over on FF some "close to someone" people have heard that McLeish and Ale Rae (assistant) are mentioned. It has become rather quiet about Warburton and Weir too. I would rather keep McCall. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,732 Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 (edited) Over on FF some "close to someone" people have heard that McLeish and Ale Rae (assistant) are mentioned. It has become rather quiet about Warburton and Weir too. McLeish has a very mixed record in management and other than a very brief spell as Dundee manager what has Alex Rae got to offer? Edited May 30, 2015 by RANGERRAB 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.