the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 Just been reading on another site it would seem that Ashely and Sevco had premises next to each other before the take-over. Taken from FF: 2 company's that are registered to S44 5LU, 1 belongs to Mike Ashley, the other sevco5053 Coincidence? You decide! There are thousands of sevcos it's just a new company start up package that you can buy then change the name off. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,815 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 So what is your point? This clearly has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with our fixture list so why mention it? You just argue for argument's sake, don't you? But I take it you have brains enough to figure it out by yourself. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 173 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 A few people missing the point here. This is big news in terms of the fraud that was conducted upon our club. The club was deliberately steered towards an insolvency event and recent arrests have shown the dubiety surrounding the purchase of the newco. Yes, our match on Saturday may be of more importance now but the two need not be mutually exclusive. Exactly. I couldn't really care what is on the front page of the papers - surely getting to the truth about what transpired at our club is the absolute priority. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 ownership? Ashley doesn't even own 10% of RIFC The investigation is into what happened, not just Ashley. Though there is an interesting thread on FF about Ashley and when he first got involved. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 You just argue for argument's sake, don't you? But I take it you have brains enough to figure it out by yourself. If you could answer the question please. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,665 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 A spokesman for Sports Direct told the Daily Record: "The premises were visited by police conducting an investigation relating to Rangers and various persons previously employed by and or associated with Rangers. "The investigation is not directed at Sports Direct, any of its directors or employees. The police were seeking documentation which might assist the investigation." If SD weren't involved why on earth would the polis be searching their premises? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 If SD weren't involved why on earth would the polis be searching their premises? Exactly - "The investigation is not directed at Sports Direct, any of its directors or employees. The police were seeking documentation which might assist the investigation." Really????? If that was the case that it was all amicable, why not send down a couple of CID to ask politely for sight of the files? Yet the account of one of the employees is: “But when I tried to step outside the building at around 11am, I was told I couldn’t leave until a full search of the premises had been carried out. “One detective said we could go into the canteen while the search was ongoing but people wanted to know what was happening so we stayed there." Hardly sounds like an amicable arrangement. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 you dont get a search warrent based on nothing. would like to know if they left with boxes of paper work or not. hope they find what they are looking for 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,665 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 you dont get a search warrent based on nothing. would like to know if they left with boxes of paper work or not. hope they find what they are looking for And definitely not for major companies like SD. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted May 6, 2015 Share Posted May 6, 2015 I would say tying Ashely in with fraud is far bigger for us than promotion this year although both would be a dream come true. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.