lenzEK 0 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 So you think if he was earning next to nothing he would have just chucked it by now? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 So you think if he was earning next to nothing he would have just chucked it by now? You are trying to say he is not accountable but he is. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 7,193 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 I can remember walking out before half time when the fans turned on john grieg at Dunfermline circa 1970 its just not on maybe to much buckfast or some other cheep wine doing their talking . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lenzEK 0 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 You are trying to say he is not accountable but he is. He is accountable, I'm saying what he earns is not of his doing and shouldn't be a factor. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 10,812 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 He is accountable, I'm saying what he earns is not of his doing and shouldn't be a factor. It's not what he is earning, it's the fact he is earning whilst doing nothing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 I would rather he was put on gardening leave like Ally, at least he can't do us any damage there. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 4,422 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 I would rather he was put on gardening leave like Ally, at least he can't do us any damage there. Spot on. He couldn't do any damage at home. But will you use the same argument to chase his replacement? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 Spot on. He couldn't do any damage at home. But will you use the same argument to chase his replacement? I doubt we will be signing anyone as useless as him on anything like those wages. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ranger_syntax 4,422 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 (edited) I doubt we will be signing anyone as useless as him on anything like those wages. His immediate replacement in the first team. Wages would be irrelevant, surely, if you really are worried about a centre half doing damage to us that is. Edited April 26, 2015 by ranger_syntax 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 (edited) I definitely don't agree with booing our own players during a game, but I agree with a lot of the other comments in this thread in the sense that I think the real sickening aspect of this is that most don't think Lee McCulloch should even still be in the team. Jig turns 37 next month and he most certainly should not still be playing as some sort of aging, make-shift central defender if (for some reason or other) the manager can't drop him. Ultimately, the manager picks the team, but despite his previous comments about Jig NOT being undroppable, I think McCall has failed to comprehend (or even properly acknowledge) just how scunnered the fans are about the subject of our captain because most of us clearly view him as neither a captain or a defender and we generally agree that he shouldn't still be getting a game for us, especially as a central defender. Edited April 26, 2015 by Zappa 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.