Laudbertz 0 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 We were led to believe a NOMAD would get appointed.The old board managed to get a NOMAD It has already been established in this here thread that a NOMAD was sought and due to the old regime was unable to go any further. They did manage to get a NOMAD, true, but whats your point? I fail to see the significance that has. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I doubt very much if T3B have the funds The stage is very much Mr King's.................. Sometimes it is better to keep quiet and let people guess. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,256 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 It's not dross, mate, it is a fact, you just put it another way. Buying and selling shares is no different from any other asset, there is a price at which one party offers to sell and a price at which another party is prepared to buy. But let's compare the market for houses with a full or even AIM listing, where most anyone can offer to sell and most anyone can offer to buy; with a situation where you can only offer to sell and the other party can only offer to buy through private introduction equivalent to a " a matched bargain trading facility " in this example. Under which method would you expect to obtain a better price for your asset? I much preferred the unlisted version , I did very well in the early 80's and dont see any reason to change my mind , plus the regulations of the AIM are a waste of money IMHO for a company of our size and the amounts of shares traded under normal conditions 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Not the point. Which shareholders is the statement referring to ? It's exactly the point. It'll be the same people investing as would have if we were still listed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
limeburner 0 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 As the man said, its all just so much noise, Some are making more than most.They know who they are. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,678 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 It's exactly the point. It'll be the same people investing as would have if we were still listed. who will be investing then? do tell us 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waltersgotstyle 307 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 My worry is that we have the whole of Rangers Media going tonto calling King everything under the sun. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 who will be investing then? do tell us Existing shareholders/fans. King, 3B's, RST, RF and individuals. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 My worry is that we have the whole of Rangers Media going tonto calling King everything under the sun. No different from any other day then! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,627 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 when we had SDM & MIH. Who have we got now? Not sure I understand the question. SDM and MIH had no impact on how easily the shares were traded, other than SDM having a scrip issue to reduce the value. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.