RANGERRAB 3,678 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Namely King and T3B if the fans don't partake. I doubt very much if T3B have the funds The stage is very much Mr King's.................. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Here's the bit which worries me from the club statement: it is the Board's view that the Company's future capital requirements can be met by shareholders Seriously who the f*&k else was ever going to invest in us? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,678 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 The delisting probably does not matter to the ordinary Rangers supporter who has bought 500 shares mainly because I would suggest this fan buys the shares not as a traditional investment but for support and sentimental reasons. If, however, you own a substantial bundles of shares, say for argument sake 9% of the share capital you might be a little concerned about who has sufficient resources to purchase your shares and at what price. To this extent your investment in this case is locked in to Rangers. I would have thought such an investor might then look for an exit strategy or compensation. On this we will have to wait and see. The other issue that is now clearer is that funds for taking Rangers forward will have to come from individuals or organisations such as Rangers First. It is to be hoped that such supporters have sufficiently deep pockets Unless DK has the funding we really are in the brown stuff now................ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waltersgotstyle 307 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 (edited) We were led to believe a NOMAD would get appointed.The old board managed to get a NOMAD Jeezo... We had the worst NOMAD going - Paul Shackleton is a charlatan. http://www.shareprophets.com/tag/paul+shackleton/ Edited April 2, 2015 by Waltersgotstyle 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I doubt very much if T3B have the funds The stage is very much Mr King's.................. I thought he wasn't spending his son's inheritance? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,678 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Seriously who the f*&k else was ever going to invest in us? Not the point. Which shareholders is the statement referring to ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,028 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 A restriction for a period, on the fluidity at which shitehawk after shitehawk can gain influence over the club, seems to be no bad thing to me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,028 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Jeezo... We had the worst NOMAD going - Paul Shackleton is a charlatan. http://www.shareprophets.com/tag/paul+shackleton/ Absolutely - also look into other shareprophets stuff, e.g. on Worthington and Craig Whyte if you are in any doubt. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 The first point was a question and the emboldened quote that you highlight was merely mirroring the jibe at me by Dave P to whose post #15 I was replying. So far as I am aware up to this point in time, King has not lent or invested any money in the Club. I supported Llambias because of his cost cutting agenda which was necessary; naturally if I had known about the terms of the loan deals I would not have supported him; and indeed have said that he and Leach (if involved) should be held to account for those transactions and that the deals at least in respect of Bigirimana and Ferguson should be repudiated. Upon enquiry, I do not believe there was ever any realistic prospect of King being acceptable under AIM rules and there were also questions over P Murray. Therefore I stand by my opinion that King either made a serious error of judgement or deliberately deceived in terms of his intentions. I agree that the word "guilty" is emotive and accept your admonition in that respect. So the club lied in their RNS? I find that unacceptable and will be asking Paul Murray why he did so. The prospective Nomad completed its checks on the "fit and proper" status of the existing and the proposed additional director of the Company and confirmed to the Company that it was satisfied on both fronts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 2,028 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 A restriction for a period, on the fluidity at which shitehawk after shitehawk can gain influence over the club, seems to be no bad thing to me. That said, I also agree with tannochsidebear in that we need to be diligent and not so willing to give our trust away unconditionally. I know others have expressed similar views. Time for action to back up the words please! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.