the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 (edited) But he's not playing up front. If we bought a midfielder in Jan and won 5 games since and we're out fought in midfield week in week out there normally ever one would be raging. 5 games he started in midfield I mean. Might be 4 I'm not 100 percent. Okay just checked it's 5 wins in games he's started. One he didn't play midfield which I am okay with. Another he was off at half time though he scored before going off. That's in 16 starts. In the games he missed we drew on and won 2. We have a Reem of draws in games he's played and a win on his only one up front. Watching him it's patently obvious to me why. Edited May 17, 2015 by the gunslinger 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Vuckic certainly isn't world class, but he's the best player we've had since Steven Naismith 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Vuckic certainly isn't world class, but he's the best player we've had since Steven Naismith talk about damming him with faint praise. It's not even true McLeoud at very least was far better. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 talk about damming him with faint praise. It's not even true McLeoud at very least was far better. Macleod was very good, but his stock has completely went downhill since leaving Rangers, whereas Vuckics stock has gone up 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Macleod was very good, but his stock has completely went downhill since leaving Rangers, whereas Vuckics stock has gone up So we're not basing it on rangers performances then. Hmmm 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 So we're not basing it on rangers performances then. Hmmm Yes, that too 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Yes, that too Takes me back to mcleoud then. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Takes me back to mcleoud then. Would be good to have both next season, along with the aforementioned Naismith, I'd be content with that 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 I'd like more than a 25 percent win rate next year so no ta. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 I'd like more than a 25 percent win rate next year so no ta. McGregor is going down with Hull this year and he's not even first choice anymore...him with Vuckic, Macleod and Naismith would get 50 percent win rate, so we will need others to improve the side... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.