pmu 0 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 i'm sure the well loved Mark will get huge financial support from across the cyber community to fight this particular fight Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 The headline is a bit misleading, I'd like to remark. Which headline is misleading? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 i'm sure the well loved Mark will get huge financial support from across the cyber community to fight this particular fight I'm not Mark's greatest fan but I reckon that is a wee bit unfair. I don't think personalities should come into it. If it was any normal punter I reckon it would be seen as an admirable cause, and I think it should be seen that way regardless, if it is for the better good of the Club and fans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,747 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Which headline is misleading? Given that this is rather a passive thing, reading the headline makes you think that SD are going to sue Dingwall. Hence, it is "a bit" misleading. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,627 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Given that this is rather a passive thing, reading the headline makes you think that SD are going to sue Dingwall. Hence, it is "a bit" misleading. They are suing him for costs, so you're being a bit pernickety on this occasion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 The same day Sport Direct lawyers made an application to the Companies Court in London seeking the following - 1/ That the Claimant shall not comply with the request of Mr Mark DIngwall by letter dated 3 February 2015 for a a copy of the Claimant’s register of members. 2/ That they “shall not comply with any future request (whether made by Mark Dingwall or any other person) to inspect the Claimant’s register of members or for a copy of that register where the only purpose given for the request is to enable members to be contacted, without identifying the subject matter and purpose of such contact: 3/ Mark Dingwall do pay the Claimant’s costs, such costs to be assessed if not agreed. The hearing is set for 11.30 on 14th April. Given that this is rather a passive thing, reading the headline makes you think that SD are going to sue Dingwall. Hence, it is "a bit" misleading. Ok, whatever you say. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,014 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 Costs are incidental to the order sought. MD would only be liable in the event of him unsuccessfully opposing the application. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) i'm sure the well loved Mark will get huge financial support from across the cyber community to fight this particular fight here's someone who wants to talk to SD shareholders regarding zero hour contracts (admirable in it's own right) and the contracts manipulated by Ashley's placemen on Rangers board, and people are criticising. In fact the sickening abuse going on elsewhere makes me wonder what exactly is behind these continuing attacks on fellow fans and fans organisations. Edited March 27, 2015 by colinstein Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,627 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 (edited) Costs are incidental to the order sought. MD would only be liable in the event of him unsuccessfully opposing the application. Sounds like he'd be liable even if he was to agree with the application. Edited March 27, 2015 by Bluedell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott7 6,014 Posted March 27, 2015 Share Posted March 27, 2015 It's in the Judge's discretion. A half decent beak would say ok, here's your order but you can whistle for your costs. The best advice for MD is to say I'll withdraw my request and you withdraw your Court application and cheerio. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts