BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 (edited) IMO with freedom of speech comes responsibility and judgement, both of which were sadly lacking from his actions in re-tweeting the said post. I am not a fan of Mr Graham, so I know some of you will take the following with a pinch of salt. I had it confirmed to me from a reliable and unbiased source within Ibrox that (as we all realised) Rangers did not do any due diligence on Mr Graham prior to his appointment and were appalled when his FB and Twitter accounts were brought to their attention but by that time the announcement had been made. If they had done due diligence and discovered the accounts he would not have been appointed. Once the offending re-tweet was brought to their attention they moved to remove him asap and the only reason it took two days was so that the respective statements could be agreed. There was no possibility that he would have been allowed to remain in office. Edited March 16, 2015 by BrahimHemdani Changed order of first two paragraphs and wording of second for clarity. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 What's smaller than a pinch, a smidgen, A grain, minuscule, infinitesimal,. In Fact no grain, nothing, empty, nada, zilch. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 More so when the club secretary was to release an approved statement apologising and that things were to move on before Chris went away for two days on business and king off somewhere else. Secretary rewrote the statement and never cleared it. Hence arms and legs grew and Chris was left with little alternative when he arrived home. Secretary's not looking too sharp after this episode and only further vindicates the anti fan rep people. It was clearly unfortunate that both Mr King and Mr Graham, had to leave town at the vital moment. However, it seems to me that you are pretty much agreeing with the information I posted. You confirm that the reason it took two days was getting the statement(s) agreed. You also confirm by implication that the minute the re-tweet became subject to comment, Mr Graham had no future on the Board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 It was clearly unfortunate that both Mr King and Mr Graham, had to leave town at the vital moment. However, it seems to me that you are pretty much agreeing with the information I posted. You confirm that the reason it took two days was getting the statement(s) agreed. You also confirm by implication that the minute the re-tweet became subject to comment, Mr Graham had no future on the Board. I will agree with you Bh, there is always two sides to every story. I think you have been given the ' none of your damn business side of the story' Just my opinion of course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 If you think that I am agreeing with you then you're more delusional than I thought. I think what you posted was pretty clear and more or less confirms my information that the decision to remove him was made last Wednesday and it then took two days to agree or disagree the statements. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 I will agree with you Bh, there is always two sides to every story. I think you have been given the ' none of your damn business side of the story' Just my opinion of course. Thank you although I'm not quite sure how you can agree with SB that I'm "delusional" and at the same time agree with my post. However, in my delusional state I guess I should be thankful for any support I can get. There are indeed two sides to every story and if I may say, that's something I have become better placed than many to know in recent years. However, a friend volunteered the information about this matter so I don't think the version I posted comes into the category you suggest. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Wrong again, and perhaps your info is from a source that is trying to hide embarrassment. Either way, you're wrong as is your source. Miles wrong. Maybe you can share your source via PM? The Club were most certainly embarrassed, that much we can agree on for sure. Sorry, you'll understand that I won't be sharing my source with you or anyone else for that matter. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WATP_Greg 0 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 (edited) I will agree with you Bh, there is always two sides to every story. I think you have been given the ' none of your damn business side of the story' Just my opinion of course. I would stop putting out rumours if I was you - did you not learn from the Gough thing? My dad is still waiting on an apology for that btw. The secretary is the Rangers First lad, so I'm not surprised to see you have a go. Cut the petty stuff please and just support the Rangers Edited March 16, 2015 by WATP_Greg 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 (edited) The Club were most certainly embarrassed, that much we can agree on for sure. Sorry, you'll understand that I won't be sharing my source with you or anyone else for that matter. Fantasists, err sorry, posters on RangersMedia by any chance ?? Edited March 16, 2015 by MoodyBlue 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 16, 2015 Share Posted March 16, 2015 Wrong again, and perhaps your info is from a source that is trying to hide embarrassment. Either way, you're wrong as is your source. Miles wrong. Maybe you can share your source via PM? If I'm wrong that the decision was made last Wednesday then why was club secretary (was) to release an approved statement apologising and that things were to move on before Chris went away for two days 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.