BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 (edited) Not BH's favourite potential director... On the contrary he is a highly experienced investment professional but without wishing to rake up the old controversy at the time I was rightly concerned at the impact on my clients with investments in his funds as he suggested it would be a full time job for the amount he wanted to invest. Since I am no longer an IFA I can look at it purely from a Rangers perspective; and from that angle it's a good thing. I predicted elsewhere that Chris Graham would be appointed to the Board. It is right that the RST are represented in light of their efforts but I fail to see what he brings to the table other than his sterling work on behalf of Mr King. I had a number of dealings with Mr Blair in the formative stages of RF and was not overly impressed; but here again it is right that they are represented. Edited March 10, 2015 by BrahimHemdani 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMazza 0 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 Interesting to see how divided people are on this. Didn't take much did it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 The appointment of CG to NED was unnecessary and only likely to cause division within the support.At the very least it should have waited until a later date Those who call Rangers supporters 'rebels' and 'blue ****s' shouldn't be taken into consideration in my opinion. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg_Mcnoleg 50 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 Is CG appointed in his RST capacity or just for being a twitter warrior on the side fo the good guys? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 well called that last week. Whats his first priority RST concerns/wants or the greater supports? they are not fan representatives they are their factions reps in my opinion. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmu 0 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 Interesting to see how divided people are on this. Didn't take much did it? Other than cg I have no idea who the other dudes are but it seems they have some history... Whilst to be convinced that murray can effectively lead this ship now he has control I do trust that any money I spend on watching Rangers is not being "stolen". If they get the team sorted out and by that I mean the right structure not chucking a few million at some has been manager, then I will spend again... All this other stuff is just playing games and rewarding allies etc and is of no interest to me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,761 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 Interesting to see how divided people are on this. Didn't take much did it? This would have happened regardless of who it was! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 The rst have been chasing the club to appoint a fan on the board for a long long time. Superb it's finally happened. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 So much for STB's apologising act. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg_Mcnoleg 50 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 well called that last week. Whats his first priority RST concerns/wants or the greater supports? they are not fan representatives they are their factions reps in my opinion. they are also a substantial shareholder. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.