BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Given you apply these reasons to King and not other people then it probably does amount to trolling. I apply the same reasoning to Mr King as I do to Mr Sandy Easdale; I didn't and don't want either anywhere near Ibrox. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 No one is questioning your dislike of king. It's the double standard where lambias is concerned that puzzles us. It's not a double standard at all, both Mr King and Mr Sandy Easdale have been convicted of offences relating to non payment of tax; so far as I am aware Mr Llambias has not been convicted of anything; but I'll stand to be corrected. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted March 12, 2015 Author Share Posted March 12, 2015 It seems to me that that is pretty clear evidence that the meetings were indeed set for the 4th. And yet Llambias told the RFB it was to be on the 6th so hopefully we both agree that this is another example of Llambias lying. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted March 12, 2015 Author Share Posted March 12, 2015 I apply the same reasoning to Mr King as I do to Mr Sandy Easdale; I didn't and don't want either anywhere near Ibrox. But you refuse to apply it to Llambias..... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,679 Posted March 12, 2015 Author Share Posted March 12, 2015 It's not a double standard at all, both Mr King and Mr Sandy Easdale have been convicted of offences relating to non payment of tax; so far as I am aware Mr Llambias has not been convicted of anything; but I'll stand to be corrected. Ah, changing your tune again. You were previously against King because he was alleged to have lied and now it's something else because The person who you were in favour of has been proven to lie also. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 And yet Llambias told the RFB it was to be on the 6th so hopefully we both agree that this is another example of Llambias lying. It was held on the 6th. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 Ah, changing your tune again. You were previously against King because he was alleged to have lied and now it's something else because The person who you were in favour of has been proven to lie also. No, in the course of the case the judge stated that he was a liar etc; all part of the same thing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,114 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 It was held on the 6th. As you yourself pointed out it opened on the 4th. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 No, in the course of the case the judge stated that he was a liar etc; all part of the same thing. Serious question here Alan and before I ask it I don't care about context at all. Have you ever lied? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted March 12, 2015 Share Posted March 12, 2015 I told my wife I was going out for a loaf, I did though come back with one 6 hours later 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.