Well done to SoS/RST/UoF and all of us who made it happen

[the gunslinger 3,366]

I didn't mean to be antagonistic, I just don't happen to agree that the boycott was good for the Club or brought about the boardroom change.

 

The loss of ST revenue is more or less equal to the first Ashley loan.

 

You mean the Ashley loan that ended greenco..........

[BrahimHemdani 1]

Luckily enough Dave King disagress with you,and I happen to agree with him,also I think you knew it was an antagonistic post!,also why didn't the rats take the money on offer from Kingco instead of loans?

 

Yes, I see that. He would say that though wouldn't he. He wouldn't say it helped drive down the share price to a point where he felt comfortable abandoning his principles to buy a shareholding.

 

It's not antagonistic just because it's a minority opinion.

 

They answered that at the time.

Edited March 6, 2015 by BrahimHemdani

[ian1964 10,761]

There is no doubt in my mind that fans not renewing ST and not turning up for games has hastened the removal of the rats,anyone who thinks different are deluded,IMO.

[BrahimHemdani 1]

the Ashley loans where a means to an end. Do you still not get that? The loans would have happened either way, they are merely the smoke that allowed him to grab up what he wanted from the start

 

The Club would not have required the loans were it not for the reduced ST uptake and generally lower attendances this season.

[simplythebest 0]

There is no doubt in my mind that fans not renewing ST and not turning up for games has hastened the removal of the rats,anyone who thinks different are deluded,IMO.

 

It's a different opinion, if we're aiming for unity it really doesn't matter now. We all did our bit in the way we thought was right.

[BrahimHemdani 1]

You mean the Ashley loan that ended greenco..........

 

I meant the recent £5 million.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Not at all, we just wouldn't have the £5/10 million loan round our neck.

 

And what would have forced the share price to 20p ?

 

Or the board out if you prefer?

[ian1964 10,761]

Yes, I see that. He would say that though wouldn't he. He wouldn't say it helped drive down the share price to a point where he felt comfortable abanding his principles to buy a shareholding.

 

It's not antagonistic just because it's a minority opinion.

 

They answered that at the time.

 

So you are not happy and rejoicing like the majority of Rangers fans?,you would rather the rats were still ruining the club?. As you know Dave King has already lost £20m in Rangers and yet he is prepared to invest again!

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Not at all, we just wouldn't have the £5/10 million loan round our neck.

 

: .:............

[Ser Barristan Selmy 222]

I meant the recent £5 million.

We didn't need that though.