andy steel 0 Posted March 1, 2015 Share Posted March 1, 2015 (edited) Emmm, I would hardly be likely to comment on something I didn't read. As I said, I stopped reading at the point you started playing to the gallery with petty antagonistic comments. I stopped reading after that silly comment. Read my responses first eh before you join the 'gang'. Parity you say? Associating his article with Jack Irvine just because it appeared patronising is balanced criticism? Give me peace!! You did well to answer the point about parity in the part of the post you didn't read. Edited March 1, 2015 by andy steel 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 You did well to answer the point about parity in the part of the post you didn't read. The Jack Irvine association was brought up in post #4 smart arse! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 :) :) Entirely guilty as charged! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted March 2, 2015 Share Posted March 2, 2015 :) :) Entirely guilty as charged! Very admirable of you to say so. Forgiven :) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.