Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 (edited) There's simply no black and white universe out there. In any case, we (as in: WE) should show enough dignity towards one another, despite conflicting opinions.- This situation couldn't be more black and white. We should show dignity to those who deserve it. Edited February 26, 2015 by Ser Barristan Selmy 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,803 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 The word dignity should never ever be associated with the easedales In any shape or form whatsoever Read again: In any case, we (as in: WE) should show enough dignity towards one another, despite conflicting opinions. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 Read again: In any case, we (as in: WE) should show enough dignity towards one another, despite conflicting opinions. I thought perhaps you included Easdale as part of 'we'. It's hard to keep track. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,803 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 (edited) I thought perhaps you included Easdale as part of 'we'. It's hard to keep track. Not that unexpected a comment ... Edited February 26, 2015 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 5,257 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 (edited) Where's the dignity in a bunch of blatant lies? In another thread I posted an email from none other than James Easdale himself which proves beyond doubt that today's RNS was blatant lies. One thing I have learnt over the past few years is that no matter the CV and supposed expertise in relevant areas, some remain blind to what may be termed as the 'fuller picture'. There are various reasons why this may appear so. - Haven't got the time to digest wide-ranging detail - Simply ignore what doesn't fit with entrenched views (wilfull blindness) - They conciously limit useable factors regards the thought process to what they think is relevant (degree of naivety & at one point may have included them saying that they don't believe in 'conspiracy theories') - Like to wind others up - Thick - Are actively trying to shape opinion (off their own bat or on behalf of others) Edited February 26, 2015 by buster. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 I have found over many years, many intelligent people have little common sense, you can only shake your head at the things they say and do. No one on here of course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,346 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 I have found over many years, many intelligent people have little common sense, you can only shake your head at the things they say and do. No one on here of course. That would be me then 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 That would be me then Thinking of myself. Apart from the intelligent bit. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 i just find everyone is thick!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 One thing I have learnt over the past few years is that no matter the CV and supposed expertise in relevant areas, some remain blind to what may be termed as the 'fuller picture'. There are various reasons why this may appear so. - Haven't got the time to digest wide-ranging detail - Simply ignore what doesn't fit with entrenched views (wilfull blindness) - They conciously limit useable factors regards the thought process to what they think is relevant (degree of naivety & at one point may have included them saying that they don't believe in 'conspiriacy theories') - Like to wind others up - Thick - Are actively trying to shape opinion (off their own bat or on behalf of others) Your list is pretty accurate, but what I used to like best about Gersnet was that posters didn't feel the need to comment on it. Diddy posts are best politely ignored or else it just ends up like any other online abuse board. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.