Little General 80 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 The Board could have given them their year's notice at any time and then said to them, we want you to stay (if they did) but we need to negotiate a more realistic salary. They didn't and seemed to prefer to keep them in place to distract our attention from other issues. come 6th March, it will fall to the new board to negotiate with them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,856 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 The Board could have given them their year's notice at any time and then said to them, we want you to stay (if they did) but we need to negotiate a more realistic salary. They didn't and seemed to prefer to keep them in place to distract our attention from other issues. LOL. Do you think they'd have accepted 'a more realistic salary' ? They're lining their pockets before they go (as they're entitled to do) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,856 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 Huge error of judgement from the board. couldnt agree more 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 in that case they would have been gone at the end of the notice period. If they'd served it at the end of Div 3 the management team would have been long gone by now 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,856 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 come 6th March, it will fall to the new board to negotiate with them. All a new board can do is negotiate a pay off. They've resigned and are under no obligation to take them back if ythey don't want to 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 All a new board can do is negotiate a pay off. They've resigned and are under no obligation to take them back if ythey don't want to who said they would take them back? I suspect a deal will be struck when the new board is appointed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,856 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 who said they would take them back?I suspect a deal will be struck when the new board is appointed. They won't be back. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Little General 80 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 They won't be back. I know they won't be back, imo they are still there to stick two fingers up at the current board and not to line their pockets, that's why I suspect a deal will be done when the new board comes in. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,856 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 I know they won't be back, imo they are still there to stick two fingers up at the current board and not to line their pockets, that's why I suspect a deal will be done when the new board comes in. Some sort of deal needs to be struck. It was reported after he'd resigned McCoist was looking for around a £300k pay-off. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 5, 2015 Share Posted February 5, 2015 All a new board can do is negotiate a pay off. They've resigned and are under no obligation to take them back if ythey don't want to i suspect ally will reinvest his pay off or waive it for dave king. he would be crazy to give this board money. i wouldn't trust them with a fiver. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.