Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

first question.

mr llambias how can we trust a single word you say when you happily lied about stadium renaming putting good money into Rangers?

 

second question.

how can this board say it works for the benefit of the club when its members cost the club millions in lost revenue through merely staying in position ?

 

question 3.

 

does the board not realise that no matter what they do or say their position remains untenable?

 

question 4.

 

why when deciding on best course action in reference to loans or shareholder involvement is no emphasis put on the actions that would attract back thousands of customers instead of accepting mike ashley loans that lose us supporters in droves?

 

question 5.

 

can this board tell us of one action it has taken that has attracted new custom and countered the losses in custom due soley to their continued particapation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody on here decided to go and be fed shit by two of Ashley's lackeys behind the rest of the board's back.

 

Shoot the messenger seems very appropriate here.

 

You may not believe a word of the answers, but this was a genuine attempt by the people involved to ask questions and give the support answers. The fighting amongst ourselves is getting boring, and yes I've been guilty of that as much as anyone before you say it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shoot the messenger seems very appropriate here.

 

You may not believe a word of the answers, but this was a genuine attempt by the people involved to ask questions and give the support answers. The fighting amongst ourselves is getting boring, and yes I've been guilty of that as much as anyone before you say it.

 

Are you for real, what f#*%ing planet are you on??????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't describe any of them as "pro board running dogs".

 

Some of them may or may not hold different views on the subject from the ones I subscribe to but that is their right.

 

Well said FS.

 

STB is absolutely right, there is some considerable nonsense being posted on here, clearly from a position of ignorance and assumption.

 

Furthermore the framing of some of the questions have put FS in a particularly difficult position.

 

Some should think before they commit their intolerant views of other Bears into a public domain.

Edited by D'Artagnan
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said FS.

 

STB is absolutely right' date=' there is some considerable nonsense being posted on here, clearly from a position of ignorance and assumption.

 

Furthermore the framing of some of the questions have put FS in a particularly difficult position.

 

Some should think before they commit their intolerant views of other Bears into a public domain.[/quote']

 

So is all the criticism nonsense or only some of it? Is some of the criticism justified?

 

Why is there not even the most basic questions about the security given to Ashley not being asked?

 

Both you and STB have claimed there has been nonsense posted without justifying it. Ignorance and assumption? (It could be claimed that saying that without justifying it or clarifying who specifically you are referring to is being intolerant). So do you have more information than we do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shoot the messenger seems very appropriate here.

 

You may not believe a word of the answers, but this was a genuine attempt by the people involved to ask questions and give the support answers. The fighting amongst ourselves is getting boring, and yes I've been guilty of that as much as anyone before you say it.

 

they should never have gone anywhere near this divisive meeting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So that's essentially 6 pages about the RFB and the participants rather than the info as such, wow. Forgive the comparison, but this all looks more like a scene from Braveheart, i.e. the one between Scottish clan lords going on about bragging rights, rather than looking at the Norman-English king problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.